The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Implicit and explicit memory in survivors of chronic interpersonal violence
Abstract
We investigated the relationship of implicit and explicit memory to a range of symptoms in a sample of 27 women with exposure to chronic interpersonal violence (IPV). Participants viewed the first 3 letters ("stems") of trauma-related, general threat, and neutral words; valenced words were matched with neutral words with the same stem. Free recall and a word-stem completion task were used to test explicit and implicit memory, respectively. Participants exhibited increased implicit memory for trauma-related words as compared with both general threat words and neutral "match" words. They also showed increased explicit memory for both general threat and trauma-related words. Finally, although neither implicit nor explicit memory was correlated with PTSD symptoms, implicit memory for trauma-related words was significantly correlated with symptoms associated with ongoing IPV. Interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, and alexithymia were significantly correlated with implicit, but not explicit, memory for trauma words. Somatization, dissociation, and alexithymia were negatively correlated with explicit, but not implicit, memory for general-threat words. These findings suggest that memory processes in survivors of IPV are closely related to the symptom profile associated with complex trauma. Exploring memory processes in survivors of IPV may lend unique insight into the development and maintenance of the symptom profile associated with IPV.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“on a measure of explicit verbal memory for threat-related (but not trauma-related) stimuli (Minshew and D'Andrea, 2015).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Minshew and D'Andrea, 2015
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McKinnon, M. C., Boyd, J. E., Frewen, P. A., Lanius, U. F., Jetly, R., Richardson, J. D., & Lanius, R. A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017 · Cited by 94
“, 2006), and in military and civilian psychiatric samples, including individuals with PTSD (Chae et al., 2011; De Bellis et al., 2013; DePrince et al., 2009; Kaplow et al., 2008; Minshew and D’Andrea, 2015; Rivera-Vélez et al., 2014; Roca et al., 2006; Twamley et al., 2009), BPD (Haaland and Landrø, 2009; Winter et al.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Minshew, R., & D'Andrea, W.
- Venue
- Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-75
- ISSN
- 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-969X
- OpenAlex
- W2078077508
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- implicit memory, declarative memory, intimate partner violence survivors, complex trauma, posttraumatic stress symptoms, word stem completion, free recall, threat words, alexithymia, interpersonal sensitivity, hostility, somatization, dissociation
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Memory, Psychological Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Domestic Violence, Survivors, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implicit and explicit memory in survivors of chronic interpersonal violence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/a0036787
- The paper
- Minshew, R., & D'Andrea, W. (2015). Implicit and explicit memory in survivors of chronic interpersonal violence. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036787