“Two souls, two thoughts,” two self-schemas: Double consciousness can have positive academic consequences for African Americans.
Open accessAbstract
African Americans can experience a double consciousness-the two-ness of being an American and an African American. The present research hypothesized that: (a) double consciousness can function as 2 self-schemas-an independent self-schema tied to mainstream American culture and an interdependent self-schema tied to African American culture, and (b) U.S. educational settings can leverage an interdependent self-schema associated with African American culture through inclusive multicultural practices to facilitate positive academic consequences. First, a pilot experiment and Studies 1 and 2 provided evidence that double consciousness can be conceptualized as 2 self-schemas. That is, African Americans shifted their behavior (e.g., cooperation) in schema-relevant ways from more independent when primed with mainstream American culture to more interdependent when primed with African American culture. Then, Studies 3 and 4 demonstrated that incorporating African American culture within a university setting enhanced African Americans' persistence and performance on academic-relevant tasks. Finally, using the Gates Millennium Scholars dataset (Cohort 1), Study 5 conceptually replicated Studies 3 and 4 and provided support for one process that underlies the observed positive academic consequences. Specifically, Study 5 provided evidence that engagement with African American culture (e.g., involvement with cultural events/groups) on college campuses makes an interdependent self-schema mor…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within the U.S., some contexts such as working-class or African American contexts highly value interdependence.
“Within the U.S., there are some contexts, such as working class or African American contexts, where interdependence is highly valued (Stephens, Markus, & Phillips, 2014; Brannon, Markus, & Taylor, 2015).”
From Culture and Healthy Eating: The Role of Independence and Interdependence in the United States and Japan (2016) · cites this paper as Brannon, Markus, & Taylor, 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 106 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- Brannon, T. N., Markus, H. R., & Taylor, V. J.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Spelman College (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 586-609
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2324494999
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 40.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (BCS-0844085)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Keywords
- double consciousness, self-schemas, independent self-construal, interdependent self-construal, African American students, academic persistence, academic performance, multicultural education, cultural identity, university students
- MeSH terms
- Achievement, Adult, Black or African American, Consciousness, Female, Humans, Male, Social Identification, Cultural Diversity, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review