Cited by 53Cultural Differences and ValuesNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

Culture and Healthy Eating: The Role of Independence and Interdependence in the United States and Japan

Open access
Levine, Cynthia S., Miyamoto, Yuri, Markus, Hazel Rose, Rigotti, Attilio, Boylan, Jennifer Morozink, Park, Jiyoung, Kitayama, Shinobu, Karasawa, Mayumi +4 more·2016·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Healthy eating is important for physical health. Using large probability samples of middle-aged adults in the United States and Japan, we show that fitting with the culturally normative way of being predicts healthy eating. In the United States, a culture that prioritizes and emphasizes independence, being independent predicts eating a healthy diet (an index of fish, protein, fruit, vegetables, reverse-coded sugared beverages, and reverse-coded high fat meat consumption; Study 1) and not using nonmeat food as a way to cope with stress (Study 2a). In Japan, a culture that prioritizes and emphasizes interdependence, being interdependent predicts eating a healthy diet (Studies 1 and 2b). Furthermore, reflecting the types of agency that are prevalent in each context, these relationships are mediated by autonomy in the United States and positive relations with others in Japan. These findings highlight the importance of understanding cultural differences in shaping healthy behavior and have implications for designing health-promoting interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167216658645

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

9 of 59 cited sources checked · 7 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    People who adhere to their relevant cultural norms tend to experience better life outcomes, including health and well-being.

    “People who adhere to their relevant cultural norms tend to experience better life outcomes, including health and well-being (e.g., Kitayama, Karasawa, Curhan, Ryff, & Markus, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kitayama, Karasawa, Curhan, Ryff, & Markus, 2010 source
  • Premisecitation

    A relatively less obvious but potentially powerful factor that could support a healthy lifestyle is the degree of fit or attunement between people and their cultural contexts.

    “A less obvious but potentially powerful factor that could facilitate a healthy lifestyle is the relative degree of attunement or fit between people and their cultural contexts (De Leersnyder, Mesquita, Kim, Eom, & Choi, 2014; Oyserman, Fryberg, & Yoder, 2007; Uchida, Kitayama, Mesquita, Reyes & Morling, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites De Leersnyder, Mesquita, Kim, Eom, & Choi, 2014 source
    • cites Oyserman, Fryberg, & Yoder, 2007 source
    • cites Uchida, Kitayama, Mesquita, Reyes & Morling, 2008 source
  • Premisecitation

    The healthy eating index used in the study predicts risk for chronic disease, especially cardiovascular disease.

    “This index predicts risk for chronic disease, especially cardiovascular disease (McCullough & Willett, 2006; McCullough et al., 2002; Chiuve et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites McCullough & Willett, 2006 source
    • cites McCullough et al., 2002 source
    • cites Chiuve et al., 2012 source
  • Findingown data

    In the Japanese sample of Study 2b, positive relations with others carried the link from interdependence to healthier eating.

    “We again used Preacher & Hayes’s (2008) bootstrap procedure, which yielded a 95% bcCI that did not include zero (.01, .07). Thus, positive relations with others mediated the association between interdependence and eating a healthy diet.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Preacher & Hayes, 2008 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The self-construal, autonomy, positive relations, and healthy eating measures are equivalent and valid across the U.S. and Japanese cultural contexts.
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported eating measures reflect actual eating behavior sufficiently for the conclusions.
    • Rests on an assumption: The mediation models are correctly specified and the indirect effects indicate causal mediation.
  • Premisecitation

    Within the U.S., some contexts such as working-class or African American contexts highly value interdependence.

    “Within the U.S., there are some contexts, such as working class or African American contexts, where interdependence is highly valued (Stephens, Markus, & Phillips, 2014; Brannon, Markus, & Taylor, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stephens, Markus, & Phillips, 2014 source

      The section “Different Selves: Expressive Independence Versus Hard Interdependence” says working-class contexts tend to foster norms of hard interdependence. The passages do not establish the same point for African American contexts, so that example is not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Brannon, Markus, & Taylor, 2015 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • May combine two claims. 18
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Parents of picky eaters are advised to avoid a battle of wills and to foster children's independence by regularly exposing children to multiple healthy options so that children eventually select them autonomously.

    “Parents of “picky eaters” are advised to avoid a “battle of wills” and to foster children’s independence by regularly exposing children to multiple healthy options so that children eventually select them autonomously (e.g., Carruth et al., 1998; Galloway, Fiorito, Francis & Birch, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Carruth et al., 1998 source
    • cites Galloway, Fiorito, Francis & Birch, 2006 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that pressure to eat can reduce intake and elicit negative reactions, while repeated exposure can increase intake of initially rejected foods. This supports avoiding a feeding struggle and continuing exposure. The paper does not advise offering multiple healthy options to foster independence or say that children will eventually select those options autonomously. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Using food to cope with stress is linked to eating high-fat and sugary foods, obesity, and poor health.

    “Using food to cope with stress has been linked to eating high fat and sugary foods, obesity, and poor health (Epel et al., 2004; Oliver et al., 2000; Tsenkova, Boylan, & Ryff, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Epel et al., 2004 source
    • cites Oliver et al., 2000 source
    • cites Tsenkova, Boylan, & Ryff, 2013 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Working-class contexts in the Western world are associated with interdependence and with less healthy eating.

    “Because working class contexts have also been associated with interdependence (Stephens et al., 2014) and less healthy eating habits (e.g., Darmon & Drewnowski, 2008), in the Western world”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Stephens et al., 2014 source
    • cites Darmon & Drewnowski, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The relationships between self-construal and healthy eating are mediated by autonomy in the U.S. and by positive relations with others in Japan.

    “Further, reflecting the types of agency that are prevalent in each context, these relationships are mediated by autonomy in the U.S. and positive relations with others in Japan.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    American respondents scored higher on interdependent self-construal than Japanese respondents.

    “American respondents also scored higher on independent self-construal, t(1414) = 10.12, p < .001, interdependent self-construal, t(1414) = 11.40, autonomy, t(1415) = 17.46, p < .001, and positive relations with others, t(1415) = 17.40, p < .001.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    American respondents had more education than Japanese respondents.

    “American respondents had more education than Japanese respondents, t(1409) = 5.58, p < .001.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Cultural norms provide guidelines about the right, true, and good ways to live and to be.

    “Cultural norms provide guidelines about the “right,” “true,” and “good” ways to live and to be (Shweder, 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shweder, 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In mainstream Japan, interdependence is the foundational schema for thought and action and the mark of what is good, true, and beautiful.

    “In mainstream Japan, however, interdependence is the foundational schema for thought and action and the mark of what is “good,” “true,” and “beautiful” (Doi, 1973; Lebra, 2004; Markus & Kitayama, 2003; Markus & Conner, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Doi, 1973

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lebra, 2004

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Markus & Kitayama, 2003

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Japan, family support predicts adherence to cancer screening recommendations, reduced alcohol and tobacco use, and consumption of a traditional diet.

    “Consistent with this hypothesis, in Japan, family support predicts adherence to cancer screening recommendations, reduced alcohol and tobacco use, and consumption of a traditional diet (Honda & Kagawa-Singer, 2006; Tsutsumi, Tsutsumi, Kayaba, & Igarashi, 1998).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Honda & Kagawa-Singer, 2006 source
    • cites Tsutsumi, Tsutsumi, Kayaba, & Igarashi, 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Both mainstream U.S. and Japan view healthy eating as the right and good way to behave.

    “Importantly, both mainstream U.S. and Japan view healthy eating as the “right” and “good” way to behave.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Korea, elderly people exercised more and ate healthier when they lived with family rather than alone.

    “Similarly, a study in Korea, another interdependent cultural context, found that elderly people exercised more and ate healthier when they lived with family, rather than alone (Sok & Yun, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sok & Yun, 2011 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Western cultural contexts, having a sense of autonomy predicts healthy behavior, whereas in East Asian cultural contexts, strong relationships do so.

    “However, some work suggests that having a sense of autonomy, which is emphasized in independent cultural contexts, predicts healthy behavior in Western cultural contexts, whereas strong relationships, which are emphasized in interdependent cultural contexts, do so in East Asian cultural contexts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ng et al., 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All variables were self-reported, which could reflect participants' ideal rather than actual eating habits, or their perceptions of independence or interdependence rather than observable behavioral differences.

    “Another limitation is that the variables were all self-reported, which could reflect participants’ ideal, rather than actual, eating habits, or their perceptions of their independence or interdependence, rather than observable behavioral differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Self-reported eating measures reflect actual eating behavior sufficiently for the conclusions.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Japan recently added new initiatives to a longstanding school lunch program to help schoolchildren develop proper, nutritious eating habits.

    “For example, Japan recently added new initiatives to a longstanding school lunch program to help schoolchildren develop proper, nutritious eating habits (Tanaka & Miyoshi, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tanaka & Miyoshi, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    HDL levels were assayed both in Tokyo and in a diagnostic testing lab in the U.S. to ensure comparability with American participants.

    “HDL levels were assayed both in Tokyo and in a diagnostic testing lab in the U.S. (Meriter Lab, Madison, WI) to ensure that the values would be comparable to those obtained for American participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The healthy eating index was standardized within each culture to control for measurement differences.

    “To control for these measurement differences, we standardized the healthy eating index within each culture (see below).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Japanese school lunch program aims to enrich school life and promote a spirit of cooperation by instilling proper dietary habits.

    “The program aims “to enrich school life and promote a spirit of cooperation by instilling proper dietary habits” (Tanaka & Miyoshi, 2012, p. 155).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tanaka & Miyoshi, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The positive relations with others subscale had reliability α = .78 for Americans and .79 for Japanese.

    “Responses were summed to compute an autonomy score (αs = .69 for Americans, .71 Japanese) and a positive relations with others score (αs = .78 for Americans, .79 Japanese).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Independence emphasizes individual expression and going against the norm, leaving room for a wider range of acceptable behaviors than interdependence, which involves meeting others' expectations.

    “Specifically, independence, which emphasizes individual expression and the norm of going against the norm, leaves room for a wider range of behaviors to be acceptable than does a norm of interdependence, which involves meeting others’ expectations of what is “good” and “right” (Gelfand et al., 2011; Riemer et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gelfand et al., 2011 source
    • cites Riemer et al., 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture's website offers guidelines that encourage people to eat healthy by making smart choices and taking control of what they eat.

    “The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (2011) website www.choosemyplate.gov offers guidelines that encourage people to eat healthy by making smart choices and “tak[ing] control” of what they eat.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The autonomy subscale had reliability α = .69 for Americans and .71 for Japanese.

    “Responses were summed to compute an autonomy score (αs = .69 for Americans, .71 Japanese) and a positive relations with others score (αs = .78 for Americans, .79 Japanese).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    At lunchtime, Japanese children serve each other, arrange and clean the tables, learn proper mealtime greetings and manners, and develop a sense of gratitude.

    “At lunchtime, children serve each other, arrange and clean the tables, learn the proper mealtime greetings and manners, and “develop a sense of gratitude” (Tanaka & Miyoshi, 2012, p. 155).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tanaka & Miyoshi, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The differences in self-construal and well-being scores likely reflect Americans' tendency to perceive the self more positively than East Asians do and participants' likely use of their cultural group as a reference.

    “These differences likely reflect Americans’ tendency to perceive the self in a more positive light than East Asians do (Heine, Lehman, Markus, & Kitayama, 1999), and that participants likely used their cultural group as a reference (Heine, Lehman, Peng, & Greenholtz, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Heine, Lehman, Markus, & Kitayama, 1999 source
    • cites Heine, Lehman, Peng, & Greenholtz, 2002 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Japan, sleeping more than others can signal that one is not diligent, and smoking may be seen as traditional or normatively appropriate, especially among men.

    “In Japan, sleeping more than others can signal that one is not diligent (i.e., has not stayed up to work or study; Steger, 2006), and smoking may be seen as traditional or normatively appropriate, especially among men.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Steger, 2006 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Other unhealthy behaviors such as smoking and getting little sleep are more common in Japan than in the U.S. or other developed countries.

    “Notably, although the Japanese diet is very healthy, other unhealthy behaviors such as smoking and getting little sleep are more common in Japan than in the U.S. or other developed countries (Ng et al., 2014; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ng et al., 2014

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2009

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If cultural fit predicts a greater sense of culturally appropriate agency, it should facilitate at least some other types of good or healthy behavior.

    “If cultural fit predicts a greater sense of culturally appropriate agency, as we have argued, it should facilitate at least some other types of “good” or “healthy” behavior as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The independent American emphasis on autonomy and personal responsibility likely underlies views that blame obese people and see restricting unhealthy food as paternalistic.

    “The independent American emphasis on autonomy and personal responsibility likely underlies these views (Brownell, 1991; Savani, Stephens, & Markus, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Brownell, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Savani, Stephens, & Markus, 2011 source
27 of 27
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The links between independent and interdependent models of the self and healthy eating in the U.S. and Japan have not yet been explored.

    “Research has not yet explored the links between independent and interdependent models of the self and healthy eating in the U.S. and Japan.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The self-construal, autonomy, positive relations, and healthy eating measures are equivalent and valid across the U.S. and Japanese cultural contexts.

    “These items were different from those used in Study 1 but, like those in Study 1, they were drawn from the Singelis’s (1994) Self-Construal Scales.”
    “All measures were assessed as in Study 1 (independent self-construal α = .60, interdependent self-construal: α = .72, autonomy α = .73, positive relations with others α = .60).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-reported eating measures reflect actual eating behavior sufficiently for the conclusions.

    “Another limitation is that the variables were all self-reported, which could reflect participants’ ideal, rather than actual, eating habits, or their perceptions of their independence or interdependence, rather than observable behavioral differences.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mediation models are correctly specified and the indirect effects indicate causal mediation.

    “We used a bootstrap approach to obtain 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals (bcCI) for the size of the indirect effects (Preacher & Hayes, 2008).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The food-to-cope measure and the healthy eating index capture the same underlying construct of healthy eating.

    “Although the use of a different healthy eating outcome (i.e., food to cope with stress, rather than the healthy eating index) might be construed as a limitation, it can also be seen as a strength because Study 2a extends the findings among Americans from Study 1 to a new healthy eating variable.”
5 of 5

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentt(1409) = 5.58reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1409) = 5.58, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1414) = 10.12reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1414) = 10.12, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1415) = 17.46reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1415) = 17.46, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1415) = 17.4reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1415) = 17.40, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1416) = 4.44reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1416) = 4.44, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1416) = 16.79reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1416) = 16.79, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1416) = 4.22reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1416) = 4.22, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1416) = 3.43reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1416) = 3.43, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1414) = 11.11reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1414) = 11.11, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1406) = 13.73reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1406) = 13.73, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1399) = 2.81reported p = .005 · recomputed p = .005

    “t(1399) = 2.81, p = .005”

  • Consistentt(1392) = 5.72reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1392) = 5.72, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1404) = 8.97reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1404) = 8.97, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1404) = 8.61reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1404) = 8.61, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1404) = 5.97reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1404) = 5.97, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1401) = 3.4reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1401) = 3.40, p = .001”

  • Consistentt(1401) = 2.45reported p = .014 · recomputed p = .014

    “t(1401) = 2.45, p = .014”

  • Consistentt(1399) = 2.56reported p = .011 · recomputed p = .011

    “t(1399) = 2.56, p = .011”

  • Consistentt(1399) = 2.3reported p = .021 · recomputed p = .022

    “t(1399) = 2.30, p = .021”

  • Consistentt(1399) = 4.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(1399) = 4.18, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(1399) = 0.11reported p = .91 · recomputed p = .912

    “t(1399) = 0.11, p = .91”

  • Consistentt(1399) = 2.77reported p = .006 · recomputed p = .006

    “t(1399) = 2.77, p = .006”

  • Consistentt(1399) = 0.69reported p = .49 · recomputed p = .490

    “t(1399) = 0.69, p = .49”

  • Consistentt(1398) = 2.42reported p = .015 · recomputed p = .016

    “t(1398) = 2.42, p = .015”

  • Consistentt(1398) = 2.39reported p = .017 · recomputed p = .017

    “t(1398) = 2.39, p = .017”

  • Consistentt(1398) = 2.32reported p = .021 · recomputed p = .020

    “t(1398) = 2.32, p = .021”

  • Consistentt(2529) = -3.69reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(2529) = −3.69, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(2529) = 10.4reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(2529) = 10.40, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(2529) = -2.16reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .031

    “t(2529) = −2.16, p = .03”

  • Consistentt(2527) = -6.24reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(2527) = −6.24, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(2527) = 5.27reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(2527) = 5.27, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(303) = 4.74reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(303) = 4.74, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(303) = 4.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(303) = 4.52, p < .001”

  • Consistentt(303) = 2.29reported p = .02 · recomputed p = .023

    “t(303) = 2.29, p = .02”

  • Consistentt(301) = 1.76reported p = .079 · recomputed p = .079

    “t(301) = 1.76, p = .079”

  • Consistentt(301) = 0.08reported p = .94 · recomputed p = .936

    “t(301) = 0.08, p = .94”

36 of 36

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Japanese interdependence confidence interval is centered on the wrong value

    Major

    In Study 2b, the reported confidence interval has a midpoint of 0.005, far from the reported coefficient of 0.10. Its endpoints are inconsistent with the stated regression estimate.

    Reported 0.1 · recomputed 0.005

  • Japanese independence slope conflicts with its test statistic

    Major

    In Study 1, the reported slope divided by its standard error is 1.00, not the reported t value of 0.11. The discrepancy affects whether this result is interpreted as near zero.

    Reported 0.11 · recomputed 1

  • Study 2b names the wrong hypothesized predictor

    Minor

    The Study 2b results describe independence as the predicted association, whereas the paper states that its hypothesis for Japan concerns interdependence.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Doi L. T., 1973, The anatomy of dependence
  2. Lee A., 1993, The New Yorker, 76
  3. Miller J. G., 2003, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 49: Cross-cultural differences in perspectives on the self, 59

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levine, C. S., Miyamoto, Y., Markus, H. R., Rigotti, A., Boylan, J. M., Park, J., Kitayama, S., Karasawa, M., Kawakami, N., Coe, C. L., Love, G. D., & Ryff, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Tokyo Woman's Christian University (JP)
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Levine, Cynthia S.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2016-08-20
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
1335-1348
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2515188070
Cited by
53
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000427)
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG027343, P01AG020166, U19AG051426)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR023942, UL1RR025011, M01RR000865)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
healthy eating, cultural values, independence, interdependence, autonomy, positive relations with others, stress coping, meat consumption, cultural differences, health behavior, middle-aged adults, health promotion interventions
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Japan, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Young Adult, Social Norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review