CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 215Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction takes two: Typical adults exhibit mind-blindness towards those with autism spectrum disorder.

Open access
Edey, Rosanna, Cook, Jennifer, Brewer, Rebecca, Johnson, Mark H., Bird, Geoffrey, Press, Clare·2016·Journal of Abnormal Psychology
DOI 10.1037/abn0000199
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent work suggests that we are better at interpreting the movements of others who move like us, and that individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) move in a quantifiably different way from typical individuals. Therefore, "social impairments" exhibited by individuals with ASD may, at least in part, represent a failure by typical individuals to infer the correct mental states from the movements of those with ASD. To examine this possibility, individuals with ASD and typical adults manually directed 2 triangles to generate animations depicting mental state interactions. Kinematic analysis of the generated animations demonstrated that the participants with ASD moved atypically, specifically with increased jerk compared to the typical participants. In confirmation of our primary hypothesis, typical individuals were better able to identify the mental state portrayed in the animations produced by typical, relative to autistic, individuals. The participants with ASD did not show this "same group" advantage, demonstrating comparable performance for the 2 sets of animations. These findings have significant implications for clinical assessment and intervention in ASD, and potentially other populations with atypical movement. (PsycINFO Database Record

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000199

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–215 of 215

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Edey, R., Cook, J., Brewer, R., Johnson, M. H., Bird, G., & Press, C.
Affiliations
  • University of London (GB)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2016-10
Volume
125
Issue
7
Pages
879-885
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
DOI
10.1037/abn0000199
OpenAlex
W2517906838
Cited by
215
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, theory of mind, movement kinematics, jerk, social cognition, animation generation
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Social Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review