Cited by 71Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Anxiety sensitivity and intolerance of uncertainty facilitate associations between generalized Pavlovian fear and maladaptive avoidance decisions.

Hunt, Christopher, Cooper, Samuel E., Hartnell, Melissa P., Lissek, Shmuel·2019·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Generalization of Pavlovian fear to safe stimuli resembling conditioned-danger cues (CS+) is a widely accepted conditioning correlate of clinical anxiety. Though much of the pathogenic influence of such generalization may lie in the associated avoidance, few studies have assessed maladaptive avoidance decisions associated with Pavlovian generalization. Lab-based assessments of this process, here referred to as aversive Pavlovian-instrumental covariation during generalization (APIC-G), have recently begun. The current study represents a next step in this line of work by conducting the first examination of anxiety-related dimensions of personality that may exacerbate APIC-G. Specifically, we test anxiety sensitivity (AS) and intolerance of uncertainty (IU) as moderators of relations between Pavlovian generalization and maladaptive avoidance decisions in 102 undergraduate students with wide-ranging levels of IU and AS. Results indicate a facilitative effect of AS on this APIC-G process, with AS strengthening relations between Pavlovian generalization and maladaptive generalized avoidance whether operationalizing Pavlovian generalization with psychophysiological (fear-potentiated startle) or behavioral measures. Additionally, IU was found to facilitate APIC-G when indexing Pavlovian generalization with behavioral but not fear-potentiated startle measures. Moderating effects of AS were most pronounced for stimulus classes bearing the highest resemblance to CS+, whereas effects of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000422

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once acquired, extinguished, or recovered, it is feasible to expect that avoidance may readily spread or generalize via relational learning to seemingly innocuous stimuli.

    “Once acquired, extinguished, or recovered, it is feasible to expect that avoidance may readily spread or generalize via relational learning to seemingly innocuous stimuli (Dymond et al., 2018; Dymond, Dunsmoor, Vervliet, Roche, & Hermans, 2015; Hunt, Cooper, Hartnell, & Lissek, 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunt, C., Cooper, S. E., Hartnell, M. P., & Lissek, S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2019-05
Volume
128
Issue
4
Pages
315-326
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2919942905
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
13.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, fear-potentiated startle, clinical anxiety
MeSH terms
Correlation of Data, Adult, Anxiety, Arousal, Avoidance Learning, Character, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Decision Making, Fear, Female, Generalization, Stimulus, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Reflex, Startle, Transfer, Psychology, Uncertainty, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review