Cited by 17Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

How Patients with an Uncertain Diagnosis Experience Intolerance of Uncertainty: A Grounded Theory Study

Open access
Yang, Zhongfang, Zhao, Xia, Zhu, Zheng, Fu, Yanfen, Hu, Yan·2021·Psychology Research and Behavior Management

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a conceptual framework to explain how patients with uncertain diagnoses experience intolerance of uncertainty (IU) in order to achieve an in-depth understanding of the process of facing uncertainty in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A grounded theory study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 21 patients with uncertain diagnoses in China from December 2018 to March 2019. The coding process followed the procedures of Strauss and Corbin: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. RESULTS: We developed a conceptual framework called 'Facing an Uncertain Diagnosis'. This framework considers not only the external and internal context of IU generation but also the ongoing process of how IU impacts patients' psychological status, cognitive response, behavior, and decision making. CONCLUSION: We suggest that healthcare professionals should be aware of the high level of IU and its psychological, cognitive, and behavioral manifestations in patients with uncertain diagnoses. Healthcare professionals should also be more cautious in shared decision making with patients with uncertain diagnoses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2147/prbm.s318263

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative research on how individuals with anxiety perceive uncertainty remains limited.

    “While many studies have linked uncertainty to anxiety (Buhr & Dugas, 2006;Kim et al., 2016) and shown a positive correlation ( Boswell et al., 2013; Chen & Hong, 2010), qualitative research on how individuals with anxiety perceive uncertainty remains limited (Yang et al., 2021).”

    From Exploring anxiety, uncertainty perception, treatment experiences and coping strategies: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. (2025) · cites this paper as Yang et al., 2021

    The Limitations section (page unavailable) calls this the first study to develop a framework for how patients with uncertain diagnoses who are intolerant of uncertainty face uncertainty. That supports a research gap for this specific patient group, but not the broader claim that qualitative research on how individuals with anxiety perceive uncertainty is limited. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [8]Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF, et al. Defining and measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medicine: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 33(1): 103– 115. 28936618 PMC5756158
  2. [21]Zhao X, Zhu Z, Yu M, et al. The experience of intolerance of uncertainty in patients with no clear diagnosis: a qualitative study. Chinese J Nursx. 2020; 55(04): 488– 493.
  3. [22]Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. University of California Press; 1986.
  4. [23]Morse JM, Stern PN, Corbin J, et al. Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation. Walnut Creek, Calif: Routledge; 2009.
  5. [25]Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Grounded theory in practice. Contemp Sociol. 1997; 28(4): 296.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Z., Zhao, X., Zhu, Z., Fu, Y., & Hu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
  • Dali University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Zheng
Venue
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Published
2021-08
Volume
Volume 14
Pages
1269-1279
ISSN
1179-1578 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3192966265
Cited by
17
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology Research and Behavior Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, diagnostic uncertainty, patient experience, conceptual framework, psychological impact, cognitive responses, decision-making, shared decision-making, coping with uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review