Cited by 29Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Research TopicsHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fluctuations in and associations between physical and psychological distance to suicide methods, fearlessness about death, and suicidal intent

Rogers, Megan L., Gai, Anna R., Joiner, Thomas E.·2022·Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science

Abstract

Previous evidence has highlighted the potential roles of both physical and psychological distance to suicide methods as an important factor in conferring suicide risk; however, less is known about the temporal stability of and associations between these constructs, other facets of capability for suicide, and suicide-related outcomes. The present study examined fluctuations in and associations between physical and psychological distance to suicide methods, fearlessness about death, and suicidal intent using ecological momentary assessment. A sample of 237 adults at high risk for suicide (61.6% female, Mage = 27.12 years) responded to six prompts daily for 2 weeks assessing their physical and psychological distance to preferred suicide methods, fearlessness about death, and suicidal intent. Results indicated that physical and psychological distance to suicide methods exhibited both trait- and state-like properties, that lower physical and psychological distance and higher fearlessness about death were associated with higher concurrent suicidal intent, and that lower psychological distance was uniquely predictive of higher subsequent time-point suicidal intent, controlling for concurrent suicidal intent. Suicide attempt history and preferred suicide methods were explored as potential moderating factors. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of assessing and intervening upon psychological distance to suicide methods, in addition to physical proximity to these methods, in lethal means counseling. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/abn0000783

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rogers, M. L., Gai, A. R., & Joiner, T. E.
Affiliations
  • Texas State University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science
Published
2022-11
Volume
131
Issue
8
Pages
868-880
ISSN
  • 2769-7541 (ISSN-L)
  • 2769-755X
OpenAlex
W4308104477
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs (W81XWH-16-20003; W81XWH-16-2-0004)
  • American Psychological Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicide risk, fearlessness about death, suicidal intent, suicide attempt history, temporal stability, high-risk adults
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Distance, Suicide, Attempted, Violence, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review