Cited by 4Media Influence and HealthArt Therapy and Mental HealthLiteracy and Educational Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of fiction reading on social outcomes: A 4-week randomized controlled study.

Open access
Dodell-Feder, David, Liu, Gloria, Amormino, Paige, Handley, Elizabeth D., Tamir, Diana I.·2025·Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/aca0000617

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dodell-Feder, D., Liu, G., Amormino, P., Handley, E. D., & Tamir, D. I.
Venue
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
Published
2025-12
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1359-1372
ISSN
  • 1931-3896 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-390X
OpenAlex
W4387875054
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Endowment for the Arts (1809928-38-18)
  • University of Rochester
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
Keywords
fiction reading, social outcomes, social skills, reading intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review