The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of fiction reading on social outcomes: A 4-week randomized controlled study.
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wu, J., Li, M., Wang, Z., & Hu, X. (2025) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101814 · Cited by 2
Developing the HeART : Tracking Racial Heterogeneity in Fiction Reading Habits
Rabinowitz, M., Soce, A. A., Buttrick, N., & Tamir, D. (2026) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.70093 · Cited by 1
Self-citationFrom involvement to effects: Current research in narrative persuasion
Green, M. C., Andreeva, I. N., & Raffloer, G. (2026) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2026.102388
Is leisure‐time reading related to empathy and social skills in 8‐ to 10‐year‐old children?
Garnham, A., Oakhill, J. V., Drew, H., & Banerjee, R. A. (2026) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjdp.70068
Metadata
- Authors
- Dodell-Feder, D., Liu, G., Amormino, P., Handley, E. D., & Tamir, D. I.
- Venue
- Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1359-1372
- ISSN
- 1931-3896 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-390X
- OpenAlex
- W4387875054
- Semantic Scholar
- 39f607d89d57d2a6b84eed210a397ec7b416fdaa
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Endowment for the Arts (1809928-38-18)
- University of Rochester
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Keywords
- fiction reading, social outcomes, social skills, reading intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review