The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leveraging human-centered design to implement modern psychological science: Return on an early investment.
Open accessAbstract
Although classic models of implementation emphasized the importance of innovation characteristics in their adoption and sustained use, contemporary implementation research and practice have deprioritized these variables. Human-centered design (HCD) is an approach that grounds product development in information collected about the people and settings that will ultimately use those products. HCD has strong roots in psychological theory, but its application is typically limited to the development of digital technologies. HCD is rarely applied to the design of psychosocial innovations-including both service-recipient-facing interventions and implementation strategies-within the applied psychological disciplines. The current article reviews the psychological origins of HCD and details pathways through which HCD theories and methods can be leveraged to advance the "core tasks" of contemporary implementation research and practice in psychology. These include (a) identification of multilevel implementation determinants through specification of user needs and contexts; (b) tailoring of implementation strategies, such as contextually driven intervention redesign; and (c) evaluating implementation mechanisms and outcomes, including disentangling how the core HCD focus on usability relates to closely associated implementation variables such as acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness. Collectively, these applications provide directions through which to leverage the mature field of HCD, maximize psychology's return on its early theoretical investment, and promote the large-scale impact of findings from across the applied fields of psychology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The project’s approach was grounded in HCD, an iterative approach to problem solving in which stakeholders are involved in all steps, from problem identification through prototype testing and evaluation (7, 8).”
From Cocreating the ICU-PAUSE Tool for Intensive Care Unit–Ward Transitions (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Accordingly, we used human-centered design methods across multiple internal medicine residency programs to create and iteratively prototype a structured ICU-to-ward transfer tool embedded within the electronic health record (EHR) [11].”
From Improving Communication in Intensive Care Unit to Ward Transitions: Protocol for Multisite National Implementation of the ICU-PAUSE Handoff Tool (2023) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048 · cited 3×
“Cognitive load theory (Sweller, 1988) Error reduction Users can prevent or rapidly recover from misapplications of intervention components.”
BackgroundProctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721
International Organization for Standardization
Gargaud, M., Irvine, W. M., Amils, R., Pinti, D. L., Cernicharo, J., Rouan, D., Spohn, T., Tirard, S., & Viso, M. (2015) · Encyclopedia of Astrobiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-44185-5_100574 · Cited by 6,716
Norman, D. A. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,415
Baddeley, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1736359 · Cited by 5,258
Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K., & Kirchner, J. E. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1 · Cited by 4,963
The Psychology of Everyday Things
Massaro, D. W., & Norman, D. A. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423268 · Cited by 3,484
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Cooper A, Reimann R, & Cronin D (2007). About Face 3: The essentials of interaction design (3rd edition). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
- Lund A (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3– 6.
- Lyon AR, Coifman J, Cook H, Liu F, Ludwig K, Dorsey S, … McCauley E (2018, 12 3). The Cognitive Walk-through for Implementation Strategies (CWIS): A pragmatic methodology for assessing strategy usability. Presented at the 11th Annual Conference on the Science of Dissemination and Implementation, Washington D.C.
- Rogers EM (2010). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
- Rogers EM (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press of Glencoe.
- Shneiderman B (1980). Software psychology. Winthrop, Cambridge, Mass, 48, 161– 172.
- Turns J, Borgford-Parnell J, & Ferro T (2015). Exploring the usefulness of personas in engineering education. 6th Research in Engineering Edu. Symposium, Dublin, Ireland.
- Wensing M, & Grol R (2005). Characteristics of successful interventions In Grol R, Wensing M, & Eccles MP (Eds.), Improving patient care: The implementation of change in clinical practice (pp. 60– 70). Edinburgh, UK: Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital health interventions to support family caregivers: An updated systematic review
Zhai, S., Chu, F., Tan, M., Chi, N., Ward, T. M., & Yuwen, W. (2023) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076231171967 · Cited by 193
Assessing the usability of complex psychosocial interventions: The Intervention Usability Scale
Lyon, A. R., Pullmann, M. D., Jacobson, J., Osterhage, K. P., Achkar, M. A., Renn, B. N., Munson, S. A., & Areán, P. A. (2021) · Implementation Research and Practice · doi:10.1177/2633489520987828 · Cited by 89
Self-citationLyon, A. R., Coifman, J., Cook, H., McRee, E., Liu, F. F., Ludwig, K. A., Dorsey, S., Koerner, K., Munson, S. A., & McCauley, E. (2021) · Implementation Science Communications · doi:10.1186/s43058-021-00183-0 · Cited by 94
Self-citationStiles‐Shields, C., Cummings, C., Montague, E. N. H., Plevinsky, J. M., Psihogios, A. M., & Williams, K. D. A. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.848052 · Cited by 79
Cohn, C., Snyder, C., Fonteles, J. H., Ashwin, T. S., Montenegro, J., & Biswas, G. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13518 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyon, A. R., Brewer, S. K., & Areán, P. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1067-1079
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- PMC
- PMC7709137
- OpenAlex
- W3110183584
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 17.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH109605, P50MH115837)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- human-centered design, implementation research, implementation strategies, psychosocial interventions, user needs, usability, implementation factors, implementation mechanisms, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, applied psychology
- MeSH terms
- Implementation Science, Humans, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
