The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The public psychology for liberation training model: A call to transform the discipline
Abstract
Written against the backdrop of the 2020 twin pandemics of a global health crisis and greater national awareness of structural racism, this article issues a call for psychology to invest in training all psychologists to respond to the social ills of racial and other forms of oppression. We introduce a public psychology for liberation (PPL) training model. Essentially, the model reflects a science, a pedagogical commitment, and practice of, by, and with the people who have been most marginalized in society. The PPL consists of five foundational domains or cross-cutting areas of expertise (e.g., facilitate human relationships; generate reciprocal knowledge and translation) and 10 interrelated lifelong practices (e.g., cultural humility; care and compassion) that foster healing and equity. The model centers the perspectives of the Global Majority, focuses on radical healing and equity, and emphasizes a developmental, culturally grounded, strengths-based approach to training. Various training initiatives consistent with a public psychology for liberation approach are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Neville et al. (2021) describe liberatory practices in counseling psychology as those that foster critical consciousness, affirm the lived experiences of racially minoritized individuals, and work toward collective healing and justice.”
From Caught between silence and truth: Graduate trainees' disclosures of microaggressions (2026) · cites this paper as Neville et al. (2021)
In the citing paper
“These frameworks help reimagine supervision not simply as a clinical or educational tool, but as a liberatory site where relationships rooted in trust, powersharing, and mutual accountability can flourish.”
From Caught between silence and truth: Graduate trainees' disclosures of microaggressions (2026) · cites this paper as Neville et al. (2021)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caught between silence and truth: Graduate trainees' disclosures of microaggressions
Concepción Cabán, L. D., Goins, R. E., Osman, F. A., Banks, B. M., Jackson, T. M., Flint, A. N., Hynes, K., & Peterson, K. R. (2026) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2026.101593
Metadata
- Authors
- Neville, H. A., Ruedas-Gracia, N., Lee, B. A., Ogunfemi, N., Maghsoodi, A. H., Mosley, D. V., LaFromboise, T. D., & Fine, M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1248-1265
- ISSN
- 1935-990X
- 0003-066X
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review