Cited by 18Career Development and DiversityPersonality Traits and PsychologyHigher Education and Employability

Toward whole-person fit assessment: Integrating interests, values, skills, knowledge, and personality using the Occupational Information Network (O*NET).

Open access
Liu, Zihan, Hoff, Kevin A., Chu, Chu, Oswald, Frederick L., Rounds, James·2025·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

. These measures were either newly developed or adapted from existing assessments to directly correspond with occupational variables from the Occupational Information Network database. Across three studies with diverse samples, we obtained extensive reliability and validity evidence to evaluate the fit assessments. Results consistently showed that integrating across fit domains led to practical improvements in predictions of relevant outcomes, including career choice and subjective and objective career success. However, some fit measures (i.e., interests and knowledge) were generally more predictive of outcomes than others (i.e., personality), thus warranting greater consideration for use in research and applied contexts. We discuss how our results advance theoretical and practical knowledge concerning the measurement of person-occupation fit in the modern labor market. Moreover, to inspire additional research and applications involving whole-person fit measurement, we made all newly developed fit assessments publicly available, providing guidance for using them with the Occupational Information Network database. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0001232

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The CABIN-NET is used to measure vocational interests in Liu et al. (2024).

    “The data used in this study came from the same data collection project as data used in Liu et al. (2024), where the CABIN-NET is used to measure vocational interests.”

    From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Liu et al. (2024)

    The Abstract (no page given) says Liu and colleagues evaluated assessments measuring vocational interests. Our copy does not name CABIN-NET, establish that it was the interest measure used, or verify the claim that the citing study drew on the same data-collection project. The repository citation lists this paper as published in 2025, rather than 2024. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The data used in this study came from the same data collection project as data used in Liu et al. (2024).

    “The data used in this study came from the same data collection project as data used in Liu et al. (2024), where the CABIN-NET is used to measure vocational interests.”

    From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Liu et al. (2024)

    The available Abstract (page not given) describes three studies and their fit assessments but does not identify a shared data-collection project with Liu et al. (2024). Searches for that project and for CABIN-NET found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z., Hoff, K. A., Chu, C., Oswald, F. L., & Rounds, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois at Springfield (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • Lafayette College (US)
  • Rice University (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2025-05
Volume
110
Issue
5
Pages
623-647
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W4402360366
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
American Psychological Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
O*NET, career interest, work values, vocational skills, occupational knowledge, personality, career choice, career success
MeSH terms
Adult, Career Choice, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Occupations, Personality, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review