Cited by 18Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

Circadian food anticipatory activity: entrainment limits and scalar properties re-examined

Petersen, Christian C., Patton, Danica F., Parfyonov, Maksim, Mistlberger, Ralph E.·2014·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Rats can anticipate a daily feeding time. This has been interpreted as a rhythm controlled by food-entrainable circadian oscillators, because the rhythm persists during several cycles of total food deprivation and fails to track mealtimes if the feeding schedule deviates substantially from 24. These and other properties distinguish anticipation of daily meals from anticipation of food rewards provided at intervals in the seconds-to-minutes range, suggesting distinct mechanisms. It has been reported that rats can anticipate meals at long, but noncircadian, intervals if they are required to work for food, and that anticipation of daily meals, expressed in operant behavior, shows the scalar property, a hallmark of timing intervals in the seconds-to-minutes range. These observations raise the possibility of a universal timing system, rather than unique mechanisms for circadian and noncircadian intervals. To test whether circadian constraints on daily meal timing depend on the measure of behavior, we re-examined formal properties of food anticipation using lever pressing and motion sensors. We observed robust anticipation in both measures to meals at 24-hr intervals but no anticipation of meals at 18-hr intervals in light-dark or constant light and no evidence that the duration of anticipation scales with the interval between lighting transitions and mealtime. We are therefore unable to confirm reports that operant measures can reveal timing at long, but noncircadian, intervals. If timing processes exist that do permit anticipation of events at long, but noncircadian, intervals, the conditions under which these can be revealed are evidently highly constrained.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/bne0000017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, C. C., Patton, D. F., Parfyonov, M., & Mistlberger, R. E.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2014
Volume
128
Issue
6
Pages
689-702
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2333858902
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
food anticipatory activity, circadian rhythm, meal timing, scalar timing, food deprivation, light-dark cycle, constant light, lever pressing, motion sensors, rats
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Conditioning, Operant, Feeding Behavior, Food Deprivation, Light, Male, Motivation, Motor Activity, Reinforcement Schedule, Telemetry, Time Factors, Time Perception, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review