The DOI matches its Crossref record; 418 of the 418 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory.
Open accessAbstract
Time is a universal psychological dimension, but time perception has often been studied and discussed in relative isolation. Increasingly, researchers are searching for unifying principles and integrated models that link time perception to other domains. In this review, we survey the links between temporal cognition and other psychological processes. Specifically, we describe how subjective duration is affected by nontemporal stimulus properties (perception), the allocation of processing resources (attention), and past experience with the stimulus (memory). We show that many of these connections instantiate a "processing principle," according to which perceived time is positively related to perceptual vividity and the ease of extracting information from the stimulus. This empirical generalization generates testable predictions and provides a starting-point for integrated theoretical frameworks. By outlining some of the links between temporal cognition and other domains, and by providing a unifying principle for understanding these effects, we hope to encourage time-perception researchers to situate their work within broader theoretical frameworks, and that researchers from other fields will be inspired to apply their insights, techniques, and theorizing to improve our understanding of the representation and judgment of time. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1913) · Henry Holt and Company eBooks · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,226
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“…an intentional, endogenous shift in attention by virtue of their symbolic meaning (e.g., an arrow pointing to the location of a forthcoming target; Posner, 1980), or may trigger automatic, exogenous orienting to a particular time, place, or channel (e.g., a brief flash near to where the target…”
BackgroundWhatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science
Clark, A. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12000477 · Cited by 5,924
Rao, R. P. N., & Ballard, D. H. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/4580 · Cited by 5,483 · cited 1×
“…signal expectations, such that only information that deviates from predicted inputs (“prediction error”) is passed on to the next step in the representational hierarchy (e.g., Friston, 2005; Rao & Ballard, 1999; see Clark, 2013, and the associated commentaries for a recent in-depth review).”
BackgroundComputational modelling of visual attention
Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35058500 · Cited by 4,733
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
The information available in brief visual presentations
Sperling, G. (1960) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0093759 · Cited by 4,042
Stevens, S. S. (1957) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046162 · Cited by 3,361
Cited by
The Socio-Temporal Brain: Connecting People in Time
Schirmer, A., Meck, W. H., & Penney, T. B. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.002 · Cited by 83
Self-citationNaghibi, N., Jahangiri, N., Khosrowabadi, R., Eickhoff, C. R., Eickhoff, S. B., Coull, J. T., & Tahmasian, M. (2024) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-023-09588-1 · Cited by 69
Balzarotti, S., Cavaletti, F., D'Aloia, A., Colombo, B., Cardani, E., Ciceri, M. R., Antonietti, A., & Eugeni, R. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12969 · Cited by 13
Sorrell, A. E., & Canu, W. H. (2018) · The ADHD Report · doi:10.1521/adhd.2018.26.7.7 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 865-907
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2308051861
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 418
- FWCI
- 17.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/bul0000045
- The paper
- Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016). Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.