The DOI matches its Crossref record; 236 of the 237 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are visual threats prioritized without awareness? A critical review and meta-analysis involving 3 behavioral paradigms and 2696 observers
Abstract
Given capacity limits, only a subset of stimuli give rise to a conscious percept. Neurocognitive models suggest that humans have evolved mechanisms that operate without awareness and prioritize threatening stimuli over neutral stimuli in subsequent perception. In this meta-analysis, we review evidence for this 'standard hypothesis' emanating from 3 widely used, but rather different experimental paradigms that have been used to manipulate awareness. We found a small pooled threat-bias effect in the masked visual probe paradigm, a medium effect in the binocular rivalry paradigm and highly inconsistent effects in the breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm. Substantial heterogeneity was explained by the stimulus type: the only threat stimuli that were robustly prioritized across all 3 paradigms were fearful faces. Meta regression revealed that anxiety may modulate threat-biases, but only under specific presentation conditions. We also found that insufficiently rigorous awareness measures, inadequate control of response biases and low level confounds may undermine claims of genuine unconscious threat processing. Considering the data together, we suggest that uncritical acceptance of the standard hypothesis is premature: current behavioral evidence for threat-sensitive visual processing that operates without awareness is weak. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ABs in attention-orienting (e.g., on a visual probe task) may also reflect both salience-driven and goal-directed processes.”
From Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [34]
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R
Buuren, S. V., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v045.i03 · Cited by 13,870
Lakens, D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 · Cited by 10,303
(1966) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,293
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 1×
“If this was unsuccessful, we adopted two conservative approaches to estimate the effect, as summary effects calculated from meta-analyses are often modestly inflated (Button et al., 2013): i) Where an effect was reported to be non-significant, but no”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention: Cognitive-Motivational Framework and Treatment
Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.001 · Cited by 210
Fernández‐Castilla, B., Jamshidi, L., Declercq, L., Beretvas, S. N., Onghena, P., & Noortgate, W. V. D. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01373-9 · Cited by 195
The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?
Rooijen, R. P.-V., Ploeger, A., & Kret, M. E. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1 · Cited by 176
A Rapid Subcortical Amygdala Route for Faces Irrespective of Spatial Frequency and Emotion
McFadyen, J., Mermillod, M., Mattingley, J. B., Halász, V., & Garrido, M. I. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3525-16.2017 · Cited by 144
Current practices in meta‐regression in psychology, education, and medicine
Tipton, E., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Ahmadi, H. (2019) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1339 · Cited by 133
The influence of subcortical shortcuts on disordered sensory and cognitive processing.
McFadyen, J., Dolan, R. J., & Garrido, M. I. (2020) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-020-0287-1 · Cited by 91
Unconscious or underpowered? Probabilistic cuing of visual attention.
Vadillo, M. A., Linssen, D., Orgaz, C. J., Parsons, S., & Shanks, D. R. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000632 · Cited by 95
Novel procedure for generating continuous flash suppression: Seurat meets Mondrian
Cha, O., Son, G., Chong, S. C., Tovar, D. A., & Blake, R. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.14.1 · Cited by 71
Bola, M., Paź, M., Doradzińska, Ł., & Nowicka, A. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13759 · Cited by 69
Social orienting and social seeking behaviors in ASD. A meta analytic investigation
Hedger, N., Dubey, I., & Chakrabarti, B. (2020) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.10.003 · Cited by 65
Three Criteria for Evaluating High-Level Processing in Continuous Flash Suppression
Moors, P., Gayet, S., Hedger, N., Stein, T., Sterzer, P., van Ee, R., Wagemans, J. P., & Hesselmann, G. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.008 · Cited by 60
Face masks impair facial emotion recognition and induce specific emotion confusions
Rinck, M., Primbs, M. A., Verpaalen, I. A. M., & Bijlstra, G. (2022) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-022-00430-5 · Cited by 50
Emotional faces guide the eyes in the absence of awareness
Vetter, P., Badde, S., Phelps, E. A., & Carrasco, M. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.43467 · Cited by 48
Han, S., Lunghi, C., & Alais, D. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep35723 · Cited by 47
No influence of eye gaze on emotional face processing in the absence of conscious awareness
Caruana, N., Inkley, C., Zein, M. E., & Seymour, K. J. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52728-y · Cited by 45
Wallrich, L., Opara, V., Wesołowska, M., Barnoth, D., & Yousefi, S. (2024) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-024-09977-0 · Cited by 62
Grassini, S., Holm, S. K., Railo, H., & Koivisto, M. (2016) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.007 · Cited by 40
Objects that induce face pareidolia are prioritized by the visual system
Caruana, N., & Seymour, K. J. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12546 · Cited by 42
The shooter bias: Replicating the classic effect and introducing a novel paradigm
Essien, I., Stelter, M., Kalbe, F., Koehler, A., Mangels, J., & Meliß, S. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.009 · Cited by 39
der Donck, S. V., Dzhelyova, M. P., Vettori, S., Mahdi, S. S., Claes, P. D., Steyaert, J. G., & Boets, B. (2020) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13201 · Cited by 45
Han, S., Blake, R., & Alais, D. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.12.007 · Cited by 32
Hedger, N., Garner, M. J., & Adams, W. J. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000640 · Cited by 29
The Challenge of Inferring Unconscious Mental Processes
Shanks, D. R., Malejka, S., & Vadillo, M. A. (2021) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000517 · Cited by 40
Stein, T., Grubb, C., Bertrand, M., Suh, S. M., & Verosky, S. C. (2017) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000305 · Cited by 28
Malejka, S., Vadillo, M. A., Dienes, Z. P., & Shanks, D. R. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104667 · Cited by 31
Kret, M. E., Muramatsu, A., & Matsuzawa, T. (2018) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/com0000108 · Cited by 31
Minimal exposure durations reveal visual processing priorities for different stimulus attributes
Lanfranco, R. C., Canales‐Johnson, A., Rabagliati, H., Axel Cleeremans, B., & Carmel, D. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-52778-5 · Cited by 30
What drives prioritized visual processing? A motivational relevance account
Maratos, F. A., & Pessoa, L. (2019) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.028 · Cited by 29
Schlossmacher, I., Junghöfer, M., Straube, T., & Bruchmann, M. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.034 · Cited by 27
Chen, B., Sun, P., & Fu, S. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107459 · Cited by 26
Blake, R., Goodman, R. S., Tomarken, A. J., & Kim, H.-W. (2019) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2019.04.003 · Cited by 23
Lanfranco, R. C., Rabagliati, H., & Carmel, D. (2023) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0001215 · Cited by 19
Unconscious integration: Current evidence for integrative processing under subliminal conditions
Zher‐Wen, & Yu, R. (2023) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12631 · Cited by 26
Korb, S., Osimo, S. A., Šuran, T., Goldstein, A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.008 · Cited by 18
Kerr, J., Hesselmann, G., Räling, R., Wartenburger, I., & Sterzer, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03396-3 · Cited by 18
Unconscious Visual Working Memory: A critical review and Bayesian meta-analysis
Gambarota, F., Tsuchiya, N., Pastore, M., Polito, N. D., & Sessa, P. (2022) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104618 · Cited by 19
Lack of Privileged Access to Awareness for Rewarding Social Scenes in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Gray, K. L. H., Haffey, A., Mihaylova, H. L., & Chakrabarti, B. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-018-3595-9 · Cited by 18
Rohr, M., & Wentura, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.689369 · Cited by 18
Webb, A. L. M., & Hibbard, P. B. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74369-2 · Cited by 16
Jiang, Y., Wu, X., Saab, R., Xiao, Y. J., & Gao, X. (2018) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.001 · Cited by 15
Anticipatory versus reactive spatial attentional bias to threat
Gladwin, T. E., Möbius, M., McLoughlin, S., & Tyndall, I. T. (2018) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12309 · Cited by 14
The Role of Gender in the Preconscious Processing of Facial Trustworthiness and Dominance
Wang, H., Tong, S., Shang, J., & Chen, W. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02565 · Cited by 14
Unbiased individual unconsciousness: Rationale, replication and developing applications
Tsikandilakis, M., Bali, P., Karlis, A., Mével, P.-A., Madan, C. R., Derrfuß, J., & Milbank, A. G. (2023) · Current Research in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.crbeha.2023.100109 · Cited by 14
When virtual reality becomes psychoneuroendocrine reality: A stress(or) review
Finseth, T., Smith, B., Steenis, A. L. V., Glahn, D. C., Johnson, M. M., Ruttle, P. L., Shirtcliff, B. A., & Shirtcliff, E. A. (2024) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107061 · Cited by 13
Should I judge safety or danger? Perceived risk depends on the question frame.
Stephensen, M. B., Schulze, C., Landrø, M., Hendrikx, J., & Hetland, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000354 · Cited by 12
Hernández‐Lorca, M., Sandberg, K., Kessel, D., Fernández‐Folgueiras, U., Overgaard, M. S., & Carretié, L. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.003 · Cited by 11
Automatic Attention Capture by Threatening, But Not by Semantically Incongruent Natural Scene Images
Furtak, M., Doradzińska, Ł., Ptashynska, A., Mudrik, L., Nowicka, A., & Bola, M. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa040 · Cited by 11
Preferential snake detection in a simulated ecological experiment
Jensen, C. H., & Caine, N. G. (2021) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24224 · Cited by 10
Short, R., Adams, W. J., Garner, M. J., Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., & Fairchild, G. F. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychopathology · doi:10.5127/jep.053915 · Cited by 9
Doradzińska, Ł., & Bola, M. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad194 · Cited by 8
Automatic processing of emotional images and psychopathic personality traits
Snowden, R. J., Juric, A. F., Leach, R., McKinnon, A. I., & Gray, N. S. (2022) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2022.2054780 · Cited by 8
Do Subliminal Fearful Facial Expressions Capture Attention?
Baier, D., Kempkes, M., Ditye, T., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840746 · Cited by 8
Visual features drive attentional bias for threat
Pakai-Stecina, D. T., Kiss, B. L., Basler, J., & Zsido, A. N. (2023) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2024.2315808 · Cited by 8
Codispoti, M., Micucci, A., & Cesarei, A. D. (2020) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13704 · Cited by 8
Emotional contrast and psychological function impact response inhibition to threatening faces
Greif, T. R., & Waring, J. D. (2018) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-018-9709-z · Cited by 10
Dynamic face mask enhances continuous flash suppression
Han, S., Alais, D., & Palmer, C. J. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104473 · Cited by 7
Grave, J., Madeira, N. G. G. F., Martins, M. J., Silva, S., Korb, S., & Soares, S. C. (2021) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2021.103165 · Cited by 6
Engell, A. D., & Quillian, H. M. (2020) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.20.6.14 · Cited by 6
Prochazkova, E., Venneker, D., de Zwart, R., Tamietto, M., & Kret, M. E. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2021.0183 · Cited by 6
Spatially Filtered Emotional Faces Dominate during Binocular Rivalry
Turano, M. T., Giganti, F., Gavazzi, G., Lamberto, S., Gronchi, G., Giovannelli, F., Peru, A., & Viggiano, M. (2020) · Brain Science · doi:10.3390/brainsci10120998 · Cited by 3
“Sentio ergo est”: Unmasking the psychological realities of emotional misperception
Tsikandilakis, M., Bali, P., Karlis, A., Morfi, P., Mével, P.-A., Madan, C. R., & Milbank, A. G. (2024) · Perception · doi:10.1177/03010066241302996 · Cited by 6
Association of visual conscious experience vividness with human cardiopulmonary function
Sun, Y., Xue, X., Li, Z., Ma, H., & Zhang, D. (2023) · Stress and Brain · doi:10.26599/sab.2022.9060033 · Cited by 5
Sato, W., & Yoshikawa, S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-47995-9 · Cited by 5
Pelliet, A., Nogueira, M., Fagundes, C., Capela, S., Saraiva, F., Pulcu, E., Harmer, C. J., Murphy, S. E., & Capitão, L. P. (2025) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2025.103848 · Cited by 5
Beware of the gorilla: Effect of goal priming on inattentional blindness
Légal, J., Chekroun, P., Coiffard, V., & Gabarrot, F. (2017) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2017.08.004 · Cited by 5
Dima, D. C., & Singh, K. D. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/394916 · Cited by 5
The UnconTrust Database for Studies of Unconscious Semantic Processing and Attentional Allocation
Schreiber, M., Stockart, F., & Mudrik, L. (2025) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04465-3 · Cited by 4
The Effects of Subliminal Emotional Priming on Rorschach Responses
Giromini, L., Lettieri, S. C., Bosi, J., & Zennaro, A. (2022) · Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach · doi:10.1027/1192-5604/a000157 · Cited by 4
Fisk, G. D., & Haase, S. J. (2023) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941231191066 · Cited by 3
Ignorance Is Not Bliss: On Issues Measuring the Awareness of Suboptimal Stimuli
March, D. S. (2024) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2024.42.1.27 · Cited by 3
Affective Biases in Attention, Cognitive Control, and Awareness
Domínguez‐Borràs, J., Bourgeois, A., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2025) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009342919.025 · Cited by 3
Perceptual and semantic same-different processing under subliminal conditions
Zher‐Wen, & Yu, R. (2023) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103523 · Cited by 4
Unconscious preparation: Effects of prime visibility on semantic generalization of task priming
Zher‐Wen, & Yu, R. (2021) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12503 · Cited by 3
Ananyev, E., Yong, Z., & Hsieh, P. (2019) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/19.13.3 · Cited by 3
Stein, T., & Verosky, S. C. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000923 · Cited by 3
Doradzińska, Ł., & Bola, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a4cse · Cited by 3
Müller, U. W. D., Gerdes, A. B. M., & Alpers, G. W. (2021) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102513 · Cited by 2
Eye gaze direction modulates nonconscious affective contextual effect
Chen, Y., Xu, Q., Fan, C., Wang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2022) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2022.103336 · Cited by 2
Zsido, A. N., Kiss, B. L., Basler, J., & Lábadi, B. (2024) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506285.2025.2451368 · Cited by 3
Reflections on Eriksen’s seminal essay on discrimination, performance and learning without awareness
Blake, R. (2020) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02098-9
Webb, A. L. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.609045 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Facial Attractiveness and Affective Person Knowledge on Visual Awareness
Shang, J., & Yang, H. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78462-1_33 · Cited by 2
Fischer, S. K., Kahane, O., Tal, A., & Mudrik, L. (2025) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niaf048 · Cited by 1
Religiosity and Organ Donation: A Meta-Analysis of Attitudes, Willingness, and Registration Status
Wen, K. J., & Hou, Y. (2025) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-025-02521-1 · Cited by 1
Effects of Low-Level Visual Attributes on Threat Detection: Testing the Snake Detection Theory
Kim, T., Kwon, D., & Yi, D.-J. (2020) · 감성과학 · doi:10.14695/kjsos.2020.23.3.47 · Cited by 1
Do Carryover Effects Influence Attentional Bias to Threat in the Dot-Probe Task?
Maxwell, J. W., Fang, L., & Carlson, J. M. (2022) · Journal of Trial and Error · doi:10.36850/e9 · Cited by 1
Perceptual awareness is gradual in temporal and dichotomous in fronto-parietal corticesPreprint
Solanas, M. P., Zhan, M., & de Gelder, B. (2022) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2022.12.14.520410 · Cited by 1
“Sentio Ergo Est”: Unmasking the Emotional Realities of MisperceptionPreprint
Tsikandilakis, M., Bali, P., Karlis, A., Morfi, P., Mével, P.-A., Madan, C. R., & Milbank, A. G. (2024) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xgu58 · Cited by 1
Associations with monetary values do not influence access to awareness for faces
Rothkirch, M., Wieser, M., & Sterzer, P. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.10875
Reversing luminance polarity: control faces are harder to recognise but easier to seePreprint
Webb, A. L. M. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zw3nb
Shenberger, E., Funkhouser, C. J., Boley, R. A., Zalta, A. K., & Shankman, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100193
Unconscious Visual Working Memory: a critical review and Bayesian meta-analysisPreprint
Gambarota, F., Tsuchiya, N., Pastore, M., Polito, N. D., & Sessa, P. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gt67h · Cited by 1
Quantitative Meta-Analyses: A Review of Current Practice
Park, S.-Y. (2019) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1436798
Metadata
- Authors
- Hedger, N., Gray, K. L. H., Garner, M., & Adams, W. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Southampton (GB)
- University of Reading (GB)
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 934-968
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2279597820
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 237
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- threat bias, unconscious processes, visual awareness, binocular rivalry, continuous flash suppression, fearful faces, anxiety, response bias, meta-regression
- MeSH terms
- Facial Recognition, Anxiety, Awareness, Facial Expression, Fear, Humans, Unconscious, Psychology, Visual Perception, Bias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review