Cited by 38Attachment and Relationship DynamicsMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Attachment style, relationship factors, and mental health stigma among adolescents.

Zhao, Wenfeng, Young, Rebecca E., Breslow, Leah, Michel, Natalie M., Flett, Gordon L., Goldberg, Joel O.·2015·Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cbs0000018

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, W., Young, R. E., Breslow, L., Michel, N. M., Flett, G. L., & Goldberg, J. O.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement
Published
2015-10
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
263-271
ISSN
  • 0008-400X (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-2669
OpenAlex
W2510127326
Cited by
38
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attachment styles, mental health stigma, adolescents, romantic relationships, relationship factors, self-stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review