Cited by 35Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Examining suicidal desire through the lens of the three-step theory: a cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation in a community sample

Pachkowski, Mikayla C., Hewitt, Paul L., Klonsky, E. David·2021·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Advancing evidence-based theories of suicide is critical to improving suicide prevention. The aim of the current study was to investigate suicidal desire through an emerging theory of suicide, the Three-Step Theory (3ST). Specifically, this study investigated the validity and predictive utility of Steps 1 and 2 of the 3ST in a Canadian community sample. METHOD: Participants were 487 adults between the ages of 35 to 90 (M = 59; 64% female, 87% White) who completed self-report measures assessing suicidal ideation and attempt history, hopelessness, psychological pain, and 5 forms of social connectedness at baseline and 6 months later. RESULTS: In support of 3ST predictions, cross-sectional analyses showed (a) the combination of pain and hopelessness strongly correlated with suicidal desire, and (b) connectedness was protective of suicidal desire among those high in pain and hopelessness. Regarding predictive utility, longitudinal analyses showed that pain and hopelessness were strong predictors of future suicidal desire and that connectedness was protective against future suicidal desire. These relationships of pain, hopelessness, and connectedness remained when controlling for baseline suicidal desire. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the validity and predictive utility of 3ST hypotheses related to suicidal desire. Taken together with previous studies, findings suggest that Steps 1 and 2 are useful for conceptualizing suicide risk and prevention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000546

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pachkowski, M. C., Hewitt, P. L., & Klonsky, E. D.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2021-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W3122309075
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2015-0412)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
suicidal desire, suicidal ideation, suicide risk, hopelessness, psychological suffering, social connectedness, suicide prevention, suicide attempt history, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Theory, Suicide, Attempted, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review