Cited by 21Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Patterns of transitions between relapse to and remission from heavy drinking over the first year after outpatient alcohol treatment and their relation to long-term outcomes.

Open access
Maisto, Stephen A., Hallgren, Kevin A., Roos, Corey R., Swan, Julia E., Witkiewitz, Katie·2020·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Studying clinical course after alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment is central to understanding longer-term recovery. This study's two main objectives were to (a) replicate a recent study that identified heterogeneity in patterns of remission from/relapse to heavy drinking during the first year after outpatient treatment in an independent data set and (b) extend these recent findings by testing associations between patterns of remission/relapse and long-term alcohol-related and functioning outcomes. METHOD: Latent profile analyses were conducted using data from Project MATCH (N = 952; M age = 38.9; 72.3% female) and COMBINE (N = 1,383; M age = 44.4; 69.1% male). Transitions between heavy and nonheavy drinking within consecutive 2-week periods over a 1-year posttreatment period were characterized for each participant. From this, latent profiles were identified based on participants' initial 2-week heavy drinking status, the number of observed transitions between 2-week periods of relapse and remission, and the average duration of observed remission/relapse episodes. RESULTS: In both MATCH and COMBINE, we identified six profiles: (a) "continuous remission," 25.3% of COMBINE sample/25.3% of MATCH sample; (b) "transition to remission," 19.6%/9.6%; (c) "few long transitions," 15.9%/33.7%; (d) "many short transitions," 13.2%/13.6%; (e) "transition to relapse," 7.2%/7.1%; and (f) "continuous relapse," 18.8%/10.5%. Profiles 1 and 2 had the best long-term outcomes, Profiles 5 and 6 had the worst, and Profiles 3 and 4 fell between these groups. CONCLUSIONS: That many individuals can remit from heavy drinking following one or more relapses to heavy drinking may be of direct interest to individuals in recovery from AUD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000615

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with severe alcohol use disorder exhibit more psychiatric comorbidities and a higher risk of somatic diseases.

    “exhibit more psychiatric comorbidities [26] alongside a higher risk of somatic diseases [27]”

    From Psilocybin-assisted therapy for severe alcohol use disorder: protocol for a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 7-month parallel-group phase II superiority trial (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    Citation [26] is attached to the psychiatric-comorbidities claim; the somatic-disease claim has a separate citation. The Method > Measures section describes assessments of depressive symptoms and mental health, and the Results > COMBINE Latent Profile Analyses section reports poorer mental health for one heavy-drinking profile. Neither passage establishes that people with severe alcohol use disorder have more psychiatric comorbidities; searches for that severity–comorbidity relationship found no such passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  2. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, & Muthén BO (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535– 569. 10.1080/1070551070157396 · DOI
  3. WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551– 558. 10.1017/S0033291798006667 9626712 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maisto, S. A., Hallgren, K. A., Roos, C. R., Swan, J. E., & Witkiewitz, K.
Affiliations
  • Syracuse University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2020-12
Volume
88
Issue
12
Pages
1119-1132
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W3114234989
Cited by
21
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA022328)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcoholism, heavy drinking, relapse, remission, outpatient alcohol treatment, treatment outcomes, recovery trajectories, Project MATCH, combines, long-term outcomes
MeSH terms
Latent Class Analysis, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Ambulatory Care, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Treatment Outcome, Alcohol Abstinence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review