Cited by 27Obesity and Health PracticesEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long-term effects of an internalized weight stigma intervention: A randomized controlled trial.

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the long-term effects of a group-based, psychological intervention designed to reduce internalized weight stigma (IWS, i.e., self-stigma), delivered in combination with behavioral weight loss (BWL) treatment, compared to BWL alone. METHOD: = 38 kg/m²) were randomized to receive BWL with the Weight Bias Internalization and Stigma (BIAS) Program or BWL alone. Participants received weekly group treatment for 20 weeks, followed by 52 weeks of monthly and every-other-month sessions. Percent weight change at Week 72 was the primary outcome, with secondary outcomes of weight change at other time points; physical activity (measured by accelerometry, interview, and self-report); cardiometabolic risk factors; and psychological and behavioral outcomes. Intention-to-treat analyses used linear mixed models to test for between-group differences. Treatment acceptability was assessed. RESULTS: = 0.18). The BWL + BIAS (vs. BWL) group produced significantly greater improvements in weight self-stigma, eating self-efficacy, and some aspects of quality of life at specific time points. Most outcomes improved significantly over time but did not differ between groups. The trial had high retention and treatment acceptability, with higher ratings in the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in weight loss were observed between the BWL + BIAS versus BWL group. Possible benefits of addressing weight stigma in weight management warrant further investigation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ccp0000819

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The possibility of increased psychiatric events with second-generation anti-obesity medications owes principally to the elevated current and lifetime rates of depression and anxiety in persons with obesity, particularly those with a BMI >40 kg/m2, who often experience the greatest ill effects of weight-related stigmatization.

    “We believe this possibility owes principally to the elevated current and lifetime rates of depression and anxiety in persons with obesity, particularly those with a BMI > 40 kg/m2, who often experience the greatest ill effects of weight-related stigmatization [99, 114, 115].”
  • More frequent lifestyle meetings do not appear necessary to induce a 15-20% weight loss with the new anti-obesity medications, and some visits likely can be conducted by telephone or video-conferencing without loss of efficacy.

    “More frequent meetings do not appear necessary to induce a 15–20% weight loss with the new AOMs, and some visits likely can be conducted by telephone or video-conferencing without loss of efficacy [31, 99].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pearl, R. L., Wadden, T. A., Bach, C., LaFata, E. M., Gautam, S., Leonard, S., Berkowitz, R. I., Latner, J. D., & Jakicic, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2023-07
Volume
91
Issue
7
Pages
398-410
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W4375860225
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K23HL140176)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
internalized weight stigma, weight self-stigma, behavioral weight loss, long-term weight loss, dietary self-efficacy, quality of life, physical activity, cardiometabolic risk factors, treatment acceptability, obesity
MeSH terms
Weight Prejudice, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Quality of Life, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review