Cited by 3Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

The role of mindfulness between adult attachment and anxiety: A dyadic approach.

Jaurequi, Matthew E., Kimmes, Jonathan G., Seibert, Gregory S., Ledermann, Thomas, Roberts, Kathryn·2023·Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cfp0000197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jaurequi, M. E., Kimmes, J. G., Seibert, G. S., Ledermann, T., & Roberts, K.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Long Beach (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice
Published
2023-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
132-145
ISSN
  • 2160-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-410X
OpenAlex
W3199873240
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Couple and Family Psychology Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness, adult attachment, anxiety, dyadic attachment, couple relationships, attachment anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review