The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The case for clinical hypnosis: Theory and research-based do’s and don’ts for clinical practice.
Abstract
We describe key aspects of hypnosis that distinguish it from other psychotherapeuticapproaches, argue that hypnosis occupies a unique niche among clinical interventions, andclaim that a substantial body of evidence supports its use across a gamut of psychologicalconditions. Hypnotic techniques are ideally suited to present useful suggestions that canalter subjective, behavioral, and physiological responses; enhance positive treatment expectancies;steer the ongoing flow of spontaneous mental activity and associations; focusattention; engage imagination; enhance rapport; access and bolster personal resources; andfacilitate self-regulation. We contend that a sufficient corpus of theory and research nowexists to extrapolate to a list of 18 “do’s and don’ts” we present that represent a utilitarianapproach to clinical hypnosis to guide its responsible, science-based use in clinical contextsand to supplement existing treatments on an adjunctive basis.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A client's or study participant's expectations, hopes, and misconceptions related to hypnosis are important factors in determining treatment success.
“A client's or study participant's expectations, hopes, and misconceptions related to hypnosis are important factors in determining treatment success.29-31”
From Best Practice Recommendations for Conducting and Reporting Controlled Trials in Clinical Hypnosis Research (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The response set theory of hypnosis reconsidered: toward an integrative model
Lynn, S. J., Green, J. P., Zahedi, A., & Apelian, C. (2022) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2022.2117680 · Cited by 28
Self-citationKekecs, Z., Moss, D., Whorwell, P. J., Varga, K., Terhune, D. B., Shenefelt, P. D., Palsson, O. S., Benedittis, G. D., & Elkins, G. (2024) · Journal of Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1177/2515690x241274538 · Cited by 12
Yapko, M. D., & Criswell, S. R. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032672298 · Cited by 9
Therapeutic aQompaniments: Walking together in hypnotherapy—and ethnography
Long, N. J. (2025) · Ethos · doi:10.1111/etho.70004 · Cited by 4
A Tribute to the Life and Work of Steven Jay Lynn (1946–2024): In Memoriam
Green, J. P. (2024) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207144.2024.2355831 · Cited by 2
Self-citationA Novel Hypnotic Intervention for the Treatment of Ornithophobia. A Case Study
Vivo, D. R. (2025) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207144.2025.2529465 · Cited by 1
Creating critical palliative hypnotic adjustments: temporality, hope, and meaning
Néron, S., & Handel, D. L. (2023) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2023.2269996 · Cited by 1
Hill, R., Short, D. N., Rossi, K. L., Erickson-Klein, R., & Sugarman, L. I. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003449126-82 · Cited by 1
An introduction to “A tribute to the life and work of Steven Jay Lynn (1946–2024): in memoriam”
Green, J. P. (2024) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2024.2374225
Self-citationEaton, L. H., Jang, M. K., Jensen, M. P., Heitkemper, M. M., & Doorenbos, A. Z. (2024) · Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101907
Cardeña, E. (2024) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2024.2396776
Self-citationMorar, S., Roy, C. L., Ruel, M., & Bioy, A. (2023) · Journal de l hypnose et de la santé intégrative · doi:10.3917/jhsi.023.0048
The Development and Use of the Valencia Scales of Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Hypnosis
Llinares-Segura, J., Alarcón, A., Mendoza, M. E., Green, J. P., & Capafons, A. (2025) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207144.2025.2507720
Self-citationAn Introduction to the Special Issue Honoring Steven Jay Lynn
Green, J. P., & Elkins, G. R. (2025) · International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00207144.2025.2536450
Self-citationTicona, D. Y. B. (2026) · Revista Scientific · doi:10.29394/scientific.issn.2542-2987.2026.11.39.5.67-79
Metadata
- Authors
- Lynn, S. J., Cardeña, E., Green, J. P., & Laurence, J.-R.
- Venue
- Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 187-200
- ISSN
- 2326-5523 (ISSN-L)
- 2326-5531
- OpenAlex
- W4229073184
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Keywords
- hypnotherapy, hypnotic techniques, hypnotic suggestion, treatment expectancy, self-regulation, adjunctive therapy, therapeutic rapport, evidence-based practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review