The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Illustrating novel techniques for analyzing single-case experiments: Effects of pre-session mindfulness practice.
Abstract
In this article we describe and illustrate various visual and nonparametric techniques that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in single-case experiments. Using an alternating treatments design across 2 cases, we tested whether practicing mindfulness would help a novice therapist stay focused and respond to a client more empathically and genuinely. Specifically, after taking a brief workshop on mindfulness, one male and one female doctoral trainee were asked, immediately before beginning each of 10 sessions, either to engage in a guided mindfulness practice for three minutes or a control activity of their choice. Five experimental and 5 control sessions were randomly scheduled for each therapist. The clients were unaware of the purpose of the study and the nature of the experimental manipulation. After each session, we administered measures of client-rated empathy, client- and therapist-rated real relationship, and therapist-rated level of hindering self-awareness. The graphed data were examined separately for each measure. Results showed that the client in Dyad 1 perceived the therapist as more empathic following mindfulness sessions, and the therapist reported less hindering self-awareness and rated the real relationship more favorably, with moderate to strong experimental effects. By contrast, Dyad 2 showed moderate to strong experimental effects for mindfulness practice on ratings of the real relationship, but not on empathy or hindering self-awareness. A cross-case comparison illustrates how replicated single-case experimental research with self-report data can advance our understanding of individual differences in response to psychotherapeutic interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In another therapist-client pair, there were moderate to strong experimental effects on real relationship ratings, but not on empathy or hindering self-awareness.
“In the other pair, there were moderate to strong experimental effects on real relationship ratings, but not on empathy or hindering selfawareness.”
From Mapping mindfulness in psychotherapy: a scoping review on conceptualization, applications, and research directions (2026) · cites this paper as Stone et al., 2018
In one therapist-client pair, mindfulness sessions led to the client perceiving the therapist as more empathetic, reduced hindering self-awareness, and resulted in a more positive real relationship.
“Results show that, in one therapist-client pair, mindfulness sessions led to the client perceiving the therapist as more empathetic, reduced hindering self-awareness, and resulted in a more positive real relationship, with moderate to strong experimental effects.”
From Mapping mindfulness in psychotherapy: a scoping review on conceptualization, applications, and research directions (2026) · cites this paper as Stone et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brief mindfulness session improves mood and increases salivary oxytocin in psychology students
Bellosta‐Batalla, M., Blanco-Gandía, M. C., Rodríguez‐Arias, M., Cebolla, A., Pérez‐Blasco, J., & Moya‐Albiol, L. (2020) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2942 · Cited by 58
Chan, S. H. W., Yu, C. K.-C., & Li, A. W. O. (2021) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.022 · Cited by 47
Macdonald, J., & Muran, C. J. (2021) · Journal of Psychotherapy Integration · doi:10.1037/int0000200 · Cited by 23
Effectiveness of mindfulness‐based interventions on psychotherapy processes: A systematic review
Garrote‐Caparrós, E., Bellosta‐Batalla, M., Moya‐Albiol, L., & Cebolla, A. (2021) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2676 · Cited by 23
Catagnus, R. M., García, Y., & Zhang, D. X. (2022) · Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s41252-022-00294-2 · Cited by 4
R., M., A., C., Q., Y., M., J., C., N., & K., M. (2026) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-08767-y
Captari, L. E., & Eubanks, C. F. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71904-2_6
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, M., Friedlander, M. L., & Moeyaert, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 690-702
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2887060001
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Keywords
- single-case experimental design, mindfulness practice, therapist empathy, therapist self-awareness, therapeutic relationship, alternating treatments design, visual data analysis, individual differences in treatment response, psychotherapeutic interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Empathy, Female, Humans, Male, Perception, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Random Allocation, Treatment Outcome, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review