The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The efficacy of synchronous teletherapy versus in-person therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Evidence suggests that digital therapy is just as effective as in-person therapy in improving clinical outcomes”
In the citing paper
“Delivering psychotherapy by videoconference has been studied in a number of clinical trials, but no large controlled trial has involved generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).”
In the citing paper
“Indeed, an increasing number of studies have documented the efficacy and effectiveness of videoconferencing psychotherapy (VCP) for mental health disorders [26,29,30,32,33].”
In the citing paper
“Indeed, most studies using videoconferencing have been conducted on anxiety-related disorders and major depression [26,29,30,32,33,88].”
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Wöllner, J., Berger, T., Schneider, J., & Spaeth, M. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/82972
“More broadly, therapists report limitations including restricted nonverbal communication, a diminished sense of presence and containment, and perceived incompatibility with core therapeutic values, which may promote more structured, cognitively oriented therapy styles [12,32,35,41-44].”
Roth, C., Schwardmann, P., & Tripodi, E. (2026) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2026.105713 · Cited by 1
von Wirth, E., Willems, S., Hanisch, C., In-Albon, T., Kölch, M. G., Schäfer, S., & Döpfner, M. (2026) · Child Psychiatry and Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-026-02089-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, T., Heckman, T. G., & Anderson, T.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
- Published
- 2022-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-178
- ISSN
- 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2850
- OpenAlex
- W4200531037
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14
- FWCI
- 2.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R21DA047893)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- telemedicine, in-person therapy, treatment efficacy, remote psychotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
