Cited by 26Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Cognitive behavior therapy for adult anxiety disorders in routine clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Öst, Lars-Göran, Enebrink, Pia, Finnes, Anna, Ghaderi, Ata, Havnen, Audun, Kvale, Gerd, Salomonsson, Sigrid, Wergeland, Gro Janne·2023·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has received strong research support for anxiety disorders such as panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. However, less is known about how CBT performs when delivered in routine clinical care. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of CBT for these anxiety disorders in adults treated in routine clinical care. Ovid MEDLINE, Embase OVID, and PsycINFO were systematically searched for articles published until May 2022. The effectiveness of CBT, methodological quality, and moderators of treatment outcome were examined, and benchmarked by meta-analytically comparing with efficacy studies for the same disorders. Sixty-six studies were included, comprising 6,113 participants. Large within-group effect sizes (ESs; Hedges’s g) were detected for anxiety measures at posttreatment (1.09) and follow-up (1.39), as well as for the secondary outcome of depression measures (0.80 at both assessment points). Attrition rate across the disorders was 15.9%. The benchmarking analysis showed that effectiveness studies had very similar ES (1.09) as efficacy studies (1.07) at posttreatment and at follow-up (1.39 vs. 1.30), and there were no significant differences in remission rates. Thus, the outcomes of effectiveness studies for these anxiety disorders are comparable with the results obtained in efficacy studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cps0000144

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Öst, L.-G., Enebrink, P., Finnes, A., Ghaderi, A., Havnen, A., Kvale, G., Salomonsson, S., & Wergeland, G. J.
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2023-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
272-290
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W4382024001
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety disorders, routine clinical practice, efficacy versus effectiveness, benchmarking, depression, remission, attrition, panic disorder, agoraphobia, social anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review