Cited by 17Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Secondary traumatic stress and vicarious posttraumatic growth in healthcare professionals: A meta-analysis.

Melinte, Bianca Mihaela, Turliuc, Maria Nicoleta, Măirean, Cornelia·2023·Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/cps0000159

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Melinte, B. M., Turliuc, M. N., & Măirean, C.
Venue
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice
Published
2023-09
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
337-351
ISSN
  • 0969-5893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2850
OpenAlex
W4383815006
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
secondary traumatic stress, vicarious posttraumatic growth, healthcare workers, vicarious trauma, posttraumatic growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review