Cited by 26Categorization, perception, and languageLanguage Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning Development

Generics license 30-month-olds’ inferences about the atypical properties of novel kinds.

Open access
Graham, Susan A., Gelman, Susan A., Clarke, Jessica·2016·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

We examined whether the distinction between generic and nongeneric language provides toddlers with a rapid and efficient means to learn about kinds. In Experiment 1, we examined 30-month-olds' willingness to extend atypical properties to members of an unfamiliar category when the properties were introduced in 1 of 3 ways: (a) using a generic noun phrase ("Blicks drink ketchup"); (b) using a nongeneric noun phrase ("These blicks drink ketchup"); and (c) using an attentional phrase ("Look at this"). Hearing a generic noun phrase boosted toddlers' extension of properties to both the model exemplars and to novel members of the same category, relative to when a property had been introduced with a nongeneric noun phrase or an attentional phrase. In Experiment 2, properties were introduced with a generic noun phrase, and toddlers extended novel properties to members of the same-category, but not to an out-of-category object. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that generics highlight the stability of a feature and foster generalization of the property to novel within-category exemplars. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dev0000183

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children understand and produce generics by about 2.5 years, before they acquire quantifiers.

    “they are understood and produced early in childhood-by about 2.5 y of age (27,28)-earlier than the acquisition of quantifiers, such as”

    From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Most prior research provided a starker contrast between generic and nongeneric than study 2 did.

    “Language can signal nongenericity in a rich variety of ways, and most prior research has provided a starker contrast between generic and nongeneric than was provided in study 2 (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35).”

    From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Past research found that generic sentences implied that a property was broadly true and conceptually central, and that the category expressed was stable with inherent properties.

    “Past research found that generic sentences implied that a property was broadly true (28,35,45,46) and conceptually central (37,38), and that the category expressed was stable with inherent properties (41,47).”

    From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Language can signal nongenericity in many different ways.

    “Language can signal nongenericity in a rich variety of ways, and most prior research has provided a starker contrast between generic and nongeneric than was provided in study 2 (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35).”

    From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

  • In the published literature, nongenerics typically manipulated the noun phrase itself, drawing attention more explicitly to the limited scope of the generalization.

    “For example, whereas study 2 only manipulated tense, in the published literature, nongenerics typically manipulated the noun phrase itself (e.g.,”

    From Generic language in scientific communication (2019) · cites this paper as [28]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graham, S. A., Gelman, S. A., & Clarke, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Graham, Susan A.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2016-09
Volume
52
Issue
9
Pages
1353-1362
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2477789471
Cited by
26
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Libraries and Cultural Resources (University of Calgary) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
  • Canada Research Chairs Program
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-36043)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
generic nouns, generic language, category learning, toddlers, generalization, language and cognition
MeSH terms
Child Language, Child, Preschool, Concept Formation, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Psychological Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review