Cited by 95Higher Education Research StudiesHigher Education Practises and EngagementEducation and Military Integration

The role of institutional agents in promoting higher education success among first-generation college students at a public urban university

McCallen, Leigh S., Johnson, Helen L.·2020·Journal of Diversity in Higher Education

Abstract

Ensuring success in public higher education among underrepresented students is integral to social equity in the United States today. The current research contextualizes proximal and structural characteristics shaping the opportunities of underrepresented students by drawing on multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to consider the influence of social capital on the success of first-generation college students in the context of a large, public urban university. We collected survey and interview data with first-generation college students enrolled at three 4-year campuses of the City University of New York to analyze the association between student outcomes and perceived social support from institutional and protective agents. Convergent qualitative and quantitative findings indicate institutional agents, specifically college faculty, play a significant role in first-generation students’ college success by imparting intellectual capital and institutional resources critical to navigating the higher education environment. We discuss implications for practitioners working with first-generation college students and for institutional change to better support these students at broad-access public colleges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/dhe0000143

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For students who have had challenges accessing medical school, particularly those from UR/nondominant groups, many external factors influence their academic performance, including access to resources, social capital, and structural inhibitors within the educational system.

    “For students who have had challenges accessing medical school, particularly those from UR/nondominant groups 1 , many external factors influence their academic performance (Hamid, 2019) including access to resources (McCallen & Johnson, 2020), social capital (Mishra, 2020), and structural inhibitors (e.g., vital conditions of living) within the educational system (Millea et al., 2018).”

Cited by

Authors
McCallen, L. S., & Johnson, H. L.
Venue
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
Published
2020-12
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
320-332
ISSN
  • 1938-8926 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-8934
OpenAlex
W2974166085
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Diversity in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
Keywords
first-generation college students, institutional agents, social capital, university faculty, student success, underrepresented students, social support, intellectual capital, City University of New York, protective agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review