The role of institutional agents in promoting higher education success among first-generation college students at a public urban university
Abstract
Ensuring success in public higher education among underrepresented students is integral to social equity in the United States today. The current research contextualizes proximal and structural characteristics shaping the opportunities of underrepresented students by drawing on multidisciplinary theoretical frameworks to consider the influence of social capital on the success of first-generation college students in the context of a large, public urban university. We collected survey and interview data with first-generation college students enrolled at three 4-year campuses of the City University of New York to analyze the association between student outcomes and perceived social support from institutional and protective agents. Convergent qualitative and quantitative findings indicate institutional agents, specifically college faculty, play a significant role in first-generation students’ college success by imparting intellectual capital and institutional resources critical to navigating the higher education environment. We discuss implications for practitioners working with first-generation college students and for institutional change to better support these students at broad-access public colleges. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For students who have had challenges accessing medical school, particularly those from UR/nondominant groups, many external factors influence their academic performance, including access to resources, social capital, and structural inhibitors within the educational system.
“For students who have had challenges accessing medical school, particularly those from UR/nondominant groups 1 , many external factors influence their academic performance (Hamid, 2019) including access to resources (McCallen & Johnson, 2020), social capital (Mishra, 2020), and structural inhibitors (e.g., vital conditions of living) within the educational system (Millea et al., 2018).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as McCallen & Johnson, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- McCallen, L. S., & Johnson, H. L.
- ORCID
- McCallen, Leigh S.
- Venue
- Journal of Diversity in Higher Education
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 320-332
- ISSN
- 1938-8926 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-8934
- OpenAlex
- W2974166085
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Diversity in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
- Keywords
- first-generation college students, institutional agents, social capital, university faculty, student success, underrepresented students, social support, intellectual capital, City University of New York, protective agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review