The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Strategic Framework Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Defining and Measuring Chronic Conditions: Imperatives for Research, Policy, Program, and Practice
Goodman, R. A., Posner, S. F., Huang, E. S., Parekh, A. K., & Koh, H. K. (2013) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd10.120239 · Cited by 807
Review: Health Care Utilization and Costs of Elderly Persons With Multiple Chronic Conditions
Lehnert, T., Heider, D., Leicht, H., Heinrich, S., Corrieri, S., Luppa, M., Riedel-Heller, S., & König, H.-H. (2011) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558711399580 · Cited by 757
The common sense model of self-regulation: Meta-analysis and test of a process model.
Hagger, M. S., Koch, S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Orbell, S. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000118 · Cited by 579
Raghupathi, W., & Raghupathi, V. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15030431 · Cited by 531
Use Your Words Carefully: What Is a Chronic Disease?
Bernell, S., & Howard, S. W. (2016) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00159 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Publisher
- Unmaintained records
- Published
- 2010
- OpenAlex
- W4234175252
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Strategic Framework Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e507192011-001
- The paper
- Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Strategic Framework Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions. (2010). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e507192011-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
