Cited by 807Chronic Disease Management StrategiesMedical Coding and Health InformationHealth and Medical Studies

Defining and Measuring Chronic Conditions: Imperatives for Research, Policy, Program, and Practice

Open access
Goodman, Richard A., Posner, Samuel F., Huang, Elbert S., Parekh, Anand K., Koh, Howard K.·2013·Preventing Chronic Disease

Abstract

Current trends in US population growth, age distribution, and disease dynamics foretell rises in the prevalence of chronic diseases and other chronic conditions. These trends include the rapidly growing population of older adults, the increasing life expectancy associated with advances in public health and clinical medicine, the persistently high prevalence of some risk factors, and the emerging high prevalence of multiple chronic conditions. Although preventing and mitigating the effect of chronic conditions requires sufficient measurement capacities, such measurement has been constrained by lack of consistency in definitions and diagnostic classification schemes and by heterogeneity in data systems and methods of data collection. We outline a conceptual model for improving understanding of and standardizing approaches to defining, identifying, and using information about chronic conditions in the United States. We illustrate this model's operation by applying a standard classification scheme for chronic conditions to 5 national-level data systems. Although the literature does not support a single uniform definition for chronic disease, recurrent themes include the non-self-limited nature, the association with persistent and recurring health problems, and a duration measured in months and years, not days and weeks--Thrall. So far, many different approaches have been used to measure the prevalence and consequences of chronic diseases and health conditions in children, resulting in a wide variability of prevalence estimates that cannot be readily compared--van der Lee et al.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5888/pcd10.120239

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contingency management can be used at different points of the treatment sequence, including initial engagement, attendance, and abstinence.

    “It can be used at different points of the treatment se quence, including initial engagement 167 , attendance 237,239 , and ab stinence 237,239,240 .”

    From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [167]

    The Introduction and Summary discuss defining and measuring chronic conditions, while the OASH-list section mentions substance abuse disorders only as conditions to classify. Our copy does not address contingency management or its use for initial engagement, attendance, or abstinence (searched those terms and treatment sequence). (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [27]Tenney JB, White KL, Williamson JW. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: background and methodology. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(61); 1974. 25102417
  2. [29]Overview of HCUP. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), November 2009. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/overview.jsp. A ccessed December 25, 2012. 21413206
  3. [30]Databases HCUP. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), November 2011. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp. A ccessed December 25, 2012. 21413206
  4. [31]NIS database documentation. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). November 2011. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp. A ccessed December 25, 2012. 21413206

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodman, R. A., Posner, S. F., Huang, E. S., Parekh, A. K., & Koh, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (US)
Corresponding author
Goodman, Richard A.
Venue
Preventing Chronic Disease
Published
2013-04-25
Volume
10
Pages
E66-E66
ISSN
1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112868039
Cited by
807
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 76 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 12
FWCI
33.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
chronic disease, chronic disease classification, prevalence estimation, data standardization, national health data system, multimorbidity, older adults, disease duration, health policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Social Support, Colorectal Neoplasms, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review