The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Belonging in the Blind Spot: Do Some Students Suffer Negative Effects in Learning Community Programs: (511062018-001)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial feelings of stigmatization were predictive of greater academic and social concerns during the school year.
“Initial feelings of stigmatization, in turn, were predictive of greater academic and social concerns during the school year.”
From Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community? (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
A separate study on EASE students found that both continuing- and first-generation students assigned to EASE felt somewhat stigmatized when learning of their assignment to the EASE program.
“Indeed, a separate study on EASE students found that both continuing- and first-generation students assigned to EASE felt somewhat stigmatized when learning of their assignment to the EASE program [56].”
From Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community? (2019) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Success with EASE: Who benefits from a STEM learning community?
Solanki, S., McPartlan, P., Xu, D., & Sato, B. K. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213827 · Cited by 55
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mcpartlan, P., Solanki, S., Xu, D., & Sato, B.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2018
- OpenAlex
- W2905191528
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Youth Development and Social Support
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
- Keywords
- learning communities, school belonging, student retention, student engagement, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
