The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stalking in America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey: (521072006-001)
Open accessAbstract
the past decade has produced media accounts of stalking victims, 1 passage of antistalking laws in all 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2 and development of a model antistalking code. 3 Despite this interest, research on stalking has been limited to studies of small, unrepresentative , or clinical samples of known stalkers; 4 law journal reviews of the constitutionality and effectiveness of specific antistalking statutes; 5 and case studies of individual stalkers. 6 Thus, empirical data have been lacking on such fundamental questions about stalking as: • How much stalking is there in the United States? • Who stalks whom? • How often do stalkers overtly threaten their victims? • How often is stalking reported to the police? • What are the psychological and social consequences of stalking? This Research in Brief presents data from the first-ever national study on stalking and addresses these and related questions. Since the data show stalking to be much more prevalent than previously thought and include other findings of broad public concern, they have significance for legislators , policymakers, intervention planners, and researchers as well as the public health and criminal justice communities. The data are from the National Violence Against Women (NVAW) Survey, a nationally representative telephone survey of 8,000 U.S. women and 8,000 U.S. men (see " Survey Methodology and Demographic Description of the Sample, " page 15). The survey, which asked detailed questions about respondents' experiences with violence, including stalking, was sponsored jointly by the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention through a grant to the Center for Policy Research. Stalking generally refers to harassing or threatening behavior that an individual engages in repeatedly, such as following a person, appearing at a person's home or place of business, making harassing phone calls, leaving written messages or objects, or vandalizing a person's property. These actions may or may not be accompanied by a credible threat of serious harm, and they may or may not be precursors to an assault or murder. 7 Legal definitions of stalking vary widely from State to State. Though most States define stalking as the willful, malicious, and repeated following and harassing of another person, some States include in their definition such activities as lying-in-wait, surveillance, nonconsensual We are pleased to publish this first in a series of joint reports on violence against women. When the National Institute of Justice …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beydoun, H. A., Beydoun, M. A., Kaufman, J. S., Lo, B., & Zonderman, A. B. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.025 · Cited by 680
The state of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature
Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (2007) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.05.001 · Cited by 382
Davis, K. E., Ace, A., & Andra, M. (2000) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.15.4.407 · Cited by 206
"They Don't Leave Us Alone Anywhere We Go": Gender and Digital Abuse in South Asia
Sambasivan, N., Batool, A., Ahmed, N., Matthews, T., Thomas, K., Gaytán-Lugo, L. S., Nemer, D., Bursztein, E., Churchill, E., & Consolvo, S. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300232 · Cited by 175
Mechanic, M. B., Weaver, T. L., & Resick, P. A. (2000) · Violence and Victims · doi:10.1891/0886-6708.15.1.55 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 1998
- OpenAlex
- W2611228377
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stalking in America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey: (521072006-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e521072006-001
- The paper
- Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey: (521072006-001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e521072006-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.