Cited by 175Stalking, Cyberstalking, and HarassmentGender, Feminism, and MediaPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

"They Don't Leave Us Alone Anywhere We Go": Gender and Digital Abuse in South Asia

Open access
Sambasivan, Nithya, Batool, Amna, Ahmed, Nova, Matthews, Tara, Thomas, Kurt, Gaytán-Lugo, Laura Sanely, Nemer, David, Bursztein, Elie +2 more·2019·Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

South Asia faces one of the largest gender gaps online globally, and online safety is one of the main barriers to gender-equitable Internet access [GSMA, 2015]. To better understand the gendered risks and coping practices online in South Asia, we present a qualitative study of the online abuse experiences and coping practices of 199 people who identified as women and 6 NGO staff from India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, using a feminist analysis. We found that a majority of our participants regularly contended with online abuse, experiencing three major abuse types: cyberstalking, impersonation, and personal content leakages. Consequences of abuse included emotional harm, reputation damage, and physical and sexual violence. Participants coped through informal channels rather than through technological protections or law enforcement. Altogether, our findings point to opportunities for designs, policies, and algorithms to improve women's safety online in South Asia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3290605.3300232

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many interviewees said Indian public-sector AI was seen as a way to modernise and fix long-standing inefficiencies in resource delivery.

    “Many respondents described how public sector AI projects in India were viewed as modernising efforts to overcome age-old inefficiencies in resource delivery (also in [175]).”

    From Re-imagining Algorithmic Fairness in India and Beyond (2021) · cites this paper as [175]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sambasivan, N., Batool, A., Ahmed, N., Matthews, T., Thomas, K., Gaytán-Lugo, L. S., Nemer, D., Bursztein, E., Churchill, E., & Consolvo, S.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Information Technology University (PK)
  • North South University (BD)
  • Independent Researcher, San Jose, CA, USA
  • Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-05-02
Pages
1-14
OpenAlex
W2911428659
Cited by
175
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 3
FWCI
48.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
online abuse, women's online safety, cyberstalking, impersonation, coping strategies, NGO staff, feminist analysis, South Asia, emotional harm, reputational damage, sexual violence, informal support networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review