Cited by 473Data-Driven Disease SurveillancePharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsPublic Health Policies and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Framework for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems for Early Detection of Outbreaks: Recommendations from the CDC Working Group: (548632006-001)

Abstract

The threat of terrorism and high-profile disease outbreaks has drawn attention to public health surveillance systems for early detection of outbreaks. State and local health departments are enhancing existing surveillance systems and developing new systems to better detect outbreaks through public health surveillance. However, information is limited about the usefulness of surveillance systems for outbreak detection or the best ways to support this function. This report supplements previous guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems. Use of this framework is intended to improve decision-making regarding the implementation of surveillance for outbreak detection. Use of a standardized evaluation methodology, including description of system design and operation, also will enhance the exchange of information regarding methods to improve early detection of outbreaks. The framework directs particular attention to the measurement of timeliness and validity for outbreak detection. The evaluation framework is designed to support assessment and description of all surveillance approaches to early detection, whether through traditional disease reporting, specialized analytic routines for aberration detection, or surveillance using early indicators of disease outbreaks, such as syndromic surveillance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/e548632006-001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 473

Metadata

Authors
Buehler, J. W., Hopkins, R. S., Overhage, J. M., Sosin, D. M., & Tong, V. T.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
PsycEXTRA Dataset
Published
2004
Volume
53
Issue
RR-5
Pages
1-11
OpenAlex
W2411555998
Cited by
473
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 21
Type
dataset
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PsycEXTRA Dataset (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
disease surveillance, outbreak detection, surveillance system evaluation, evaluation framework, timeliness, validity, disease reporting, aberration detection, syndromic surveillance, early indicators, state and local health departments, terrorist threats
MeSH terms
Disease Outbreaks, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Population Surveillance, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review