The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infant Mortality Statistics from the 1999 Period: Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set: (558952006-001)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This report presents 2010 period infant mortality statistics from the linked birth/infant death data set (linked file) by maternal and infant characteristics. The linked file differs from the mortality rate declined mortality file, which is based entirely on death certificate data. METHODS: Descriptive tabulations of data are presented and interpreted. RESULTS: The U.S. infant mortality rate was 6.14 infant deaths per 1,000 live births in 2010, 4% lower than the rate of 6.39 in 2009. The number of infant deaths was 24,572 in 2010, a decline of 1,836 infant deaths from 2009. From 2009 to 2010, the infant mortality rate declined 8% for non-Hispanic black mothers to 11.46, and 3% for non-Hispanic white mothers to 5.18. Asian or Pacific Islander mothers had the lowest rate in 2010 (4.27). From 2009 to 2010, the neonatal mortality rate declined by 3% to 4.05 neonatal deaths per 1,000 live births, while the postneonatal mortality rate declined 5% to 2.10. In 2010, infants born at 37-38 weeks of gestation (early term) had infant mortality rates that were 62% higher than those born at 39-41 weeks of gestation. For multiple births, the infant mortality rate was 25.41, almost five times the rate of 5.45 for singleton births. The three leading causes of infant death-congenital malformations, low birthweight, and sudden infant death syndrome-accounted for 46% of all infant deaths. In 2010, 35.2% of infant deaths were preterm-related.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Racial Disparities in Preterm Birth
Culhane, J. F., & Goldenberg, R. L. (2011) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2011.02.020 · Cited by 196
Cited by
Racial and ethnic disparities in birth outcomes: a life-course perspective
Lu, M. C., & Halfon, N. (2003) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1022537516969 · Cited by 979
The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth
Frey, H. A., & Klebanoff, M. A. (2016) · Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.011 · Cited by 624
Moon, R. Y., TASK FORCE ON SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME, Darnall, R. A., Feldman-Winter, L., Goodstein, M. H., & Hauck, F. R. (2016) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2016-2940 · Cited by 583
Singh, G. K., & Hiatt, R. A. (2006) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyl089 · Cited by 448
Racial discrimination and adverse birth outcomes: an integrative review
Alhusen, J. L., Bower, K. M., Epstein, E., & Sharps, P. (2016) · Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health · doi:10.1111/jmwh.12490 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathews, T. J., MacDorman, M. F., & Menacker, F.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2002
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1-26
- OpenAlex
- W2183920415
- Cited by
- 842
- References
- 1
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infant Mortality Statistics from the 1999 Period: Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set: (558952006-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e558952006-001
- The paper
- Mathews, T. J., MacDorman, M. F., & Menacker, F. (2002). Infant Mortality Statistics from the 1999 Period: Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set: (558952006-001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e558952006-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.