The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives: (597202012-001)
Abstract
Poverty reduction on a large scale depends on empowering those who are most motivated to move out of poverty-poor people themselves. But if empowerment cannot be measured, it will not be taken seriously in development policy making and programming. Building on the and Poverty Reduction Sourcebook, this volume outlines a conceptual framework that can be used to monitor and evaluate programs centered on empowerment approaches. It presents the perspectives of 27 distinguished researchers and practitioners in economics, political science, sociology, psychology, anthropology, and demography, all of whom are grappling in different ways with the challenge of measuring empowerment. The authors draw from their research and experiences at different levels, from households to communities to nations, in various regions of the world. Measuring Empowerment is a resource for all who are interested in approaches to poverty reduction that address issues of inequitable power relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agency and empowerment: a proposal for internationally comparable indicators
IBRAHIM, S., & ALKIRE, S. (2007) · Oxford Development Studies · doi:10.1080/13600810701701897 · Cited by 644
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Narayan, D.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2005
- OpenAlex
- W3152486541
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives: (597202012-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e597202012-001
- The paper
- Narayan, D. (2005). Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives: (597202012-001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e597202012-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.