The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why?: (622272007-001)
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to focus attention on the types of individuals and groups that are prone to terrorism in an effort to help improve U.S. counterterrorist methods and policies. The emergence of amorphous and largely unknown terrorist individuals and groups operating independently (freelancers) and the new recruitment patterns of some groups, such as recruiting suicide commandos, female and child terrorists, and scientists capable of developing weapons of mass destruction, provide a measure of urgency to increasing our understanding of the psychological and sociological dynamics of terrorist groups and individuals. The approach used in this study is twofold. First, the study examines the relevant literature and assesses the current knowledge of the subject. Second, the study seeks to develop psychological and sociological profiles of foreign terrorist individuals and selected groups to use as case studies in assessing trends, motivations, likely behavior, and actions that might deter such behavior, as well as reveal vulnerabilities that would aid in combating terrorist groups and individuals. Because this survey is concerned not only with assessing the extensive literature on sociopsychological aspects of terrorism, but also on providing case studies of about 12 terrorist groups, it is limited by time constraints and data availability in the amount of attention that it can give to the individual groups, let alone individual leaders or other members. Thus, analysis of the groups and leaders will necessarily be incomplete. A longer study would allow for the collection and study of the literature produced by each group in the form of autobiographies of former members, group communiques and manifestos, news media interviews, and other resources. Much information about the terrorist mindset and decision-making process can be gleaned from such sources. For transliterated Arabic and Persian names, the popular, rather than scholarly, forms are used in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evidence about the Link Between Education, Poverty and Terrorism among Palestinians
Berrebi, C. (2007) · Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy · doi:10.2202/1554-8597.1101 · Cited by 357
Kto Kogo?: A Cross-Country Study of the Origins and Targets of Terrorism
Krueger, A. B., & Laitin, D. D. (2008) · Terrorism, Economic Development, and Political Openness · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754388.006 · Cited by 302
Climate Change Risk Perception in Taiwan: Correlation with Individual and Societal Factors
Sun, Y., & Han, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15010091 · Cited by 91
The economic impact of cyber terrorism
Hua, J., & Bapna, S. (2013) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2012.10.004 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudson, R. A., Majeska, M., Savada, A. M., & Metz, H. C.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 1999
- OpenAlex
- W2151707080
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why?: (622272007-001). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e622272007-001
- The paper
- Hudson, R. A., Majeska, M., Savada, A. M., & Metz, H. C. (1999). The Sociology and Psychology of Terrorism: Who Becomes a Terrorist and Why?: (622272007-001). PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e622272007-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.