The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Gap or A Chasm?: Attrition in Reported Rape Cases
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives.
Frazier, P. A., & Haney, B. (1996) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01499234 · Cited by 319
Prosecuting and Defending Rape: Perspectives From the Bar
Temkin, J. (2000) · Journal of Law and Society · doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00152 · Cited by 124
Cited by
Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002 · Cited by 620
Rape and Attrition in the Legal Process: A Comparative Analysis of Five Countries
Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2010) · Crime and Justice · doi:10.1086/653101 · Cited by 343
Designing out vulnerability, building in respect: violence, safety and sex work policy
Sanders, T., & Campbell, R. (2007) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00136.x · Cited by 289
Hohl, K., & Stanko, E. A. (2015) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370815571949 · Cited by 234
Brown, J. M., Hamilton, C., & O'Neill, D. (2007) · Psychology, Crime & Law · doi:10.1080/10683160601060507 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly, L., Lovett, J., & Regan, L.
- Venue
- PsycEXTRA Dataset
- Published
- 2005
- OpenAlex
- W2131249766
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 2
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Gap or A Chasm?: Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/e669452007-001
- The paper
- Kelly, L., Lovett, J., & Regan, L. (2005). A Gap or A Chasm?: Attrition in Reported Rape Cases. PsycEXTRA Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/e669452007-001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
