Longitudinal links between perinatal grief and sexual well-being for couples after pregnancy loss
Abstract
Pregnancy loss disrupts couples' sexual well-being, which is crucial to health and relationship quality, yet it is unclear what predicts sexual well-being postloss. Symbolic interactionism theory and prior literature point to perinatal grief as one potential predictor. Thus, our objective was to examine how perinatal grief of either couple member relates longitudinally to both couple members' sexual well-being after a pregnancy loss. We conducted multilevel structural equation modeling assessing whether fluctuations in perinatal grief were associated with fluctuations in sexual well-being for oneself and a partner among 109 couples who experienced a pregnancy loss in the past 4 months and who completed four monthly surveys. We also tested whether those with the highest average perinatal grief had the lowest average sexual well-being. When either partner reported greater than typical perinatal grief, both couple members reported lower than typical sexual satisfaction and sexual desire, and higher than typical sexual function problems and sexual distress. Those with the highest average perinatal grief had the lowest average sexual satisfaction and highest average sexual function problems and sexual distress. Higher perinatal grief may be a risk factor for lower sexual well-being. Couples who grieve effectively postloss may better manage sexual challenges. Practitioners can screen couples for perinatal grief as they assess impacts to sexuality, refer them to grief resources to promote sexual well-being, and invite them to discuss how meanings around sex may have changed postloss. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parents who suffer perinatal loss face relationship difficulties, with most couples suffering a decline in intimacy.
“as well as relationship difficulties, with most couples suffering from a decline in intimacy (Allsop et al., 2025; Schwenck et al., 2025).”
From Nurses' and midwives' experiences of supporting parents following perinatal bereavement: A qualitative systematic review (2026) · cites this paper as Allsop et al., 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gao, H., Iwunze, C. J., An, X., Zhou, T., & Curtin, M. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100538 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Allsop, D. B., Nesbitt-Daly, K., Péloquin, K., Cockwell, H., & Rosen, N. O.
- Affiliations
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Family Psychology
- Published
- 2025-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 627-638
- ISSN
- 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1293
- OpenAlex
- W4410854793
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DalSpace (Dalhousie University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre (1026674)
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (435-2017-0534)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Keywords
- perinatal grief, miscarriage, sexual well-being, couples, sexual satisfaction, sexual desire, sexual distress, symbolic interactionism, bereavement
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Female, Grief, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Pregnancy, Sexual Behavior, Spouses, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review