Cited by 19Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and AssessmentInnovations in Medical Education

An investigation of the criterion problem for one group of medical specialists.

Richards, James M., Taylor, Calvin W., Price, Philip B., Jacobsen, Tony L.·1965·Journal of Applied Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0021960

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A main problem with studying postgraduate clinical performance is establishing a comparable scoring system for assessing competency in different specialties.

    “One of the main problems with studying postgraduate clinical performance is establishing a comparable scoring system for assessing competency in different specialties.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, J. M., Taylor, C. W., Price, P. B., & Jacobsen, T. L.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
1965-04
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
79-90
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2025363628
Cited by
19
References
5
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
criterion problem, specialist physicians, personnel selection
MeSH terms
Aptitude Tests, Education, Medical, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Specialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review