The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cultural adaptation of treatments: A resource for considering culture in evidence-based practice
Bernal, G., Jiménez-Chafey, M. I., & Domenech Rodríguez, M. M. (2009) · Professional Psychology: Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/a0016401 · Cited by 1,186
The Future of Intervention Science: Process-Based Therapy
Hofmann, S. G., & Hayes, S. C. (2019) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702618772296 · Cited by 888
“why two years earlier Paul had not included the phrase “and how does it come about” in the original formulation of this question, focusing entirely on contextually specific evidence-based procedures (Paul, 1967).”
Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2005) · Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s11020-005-1962-6 · Cited by 717
Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.10177 · Cited by 683
Olatunji, B. O., Davis, M. L., Powers, M. B., & Smits, J. A. J. (2013) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.08.020 · Cited by 659
Metadata
- Authors
- Paul, G. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Consulting Psychology
- Published
- 1967
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-118
- ISSN
- 0095-8891 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010699969
- Cited by
- 1,026
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0024436
- The paper
- Paul, G. L. (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
