The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Alzheimer's Disease and Parkinson's Disease
Nussbaum, R. L., & Ellis, C. E. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm2003ra020003 · Cited by 1,351
Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas
Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5 · Cited by 1,821
Posterior cingulate cortex activation by emotional words: fMRI evidence from a valence decision task
Maddock, R. J., Garrett, A. S., & Buonocore, M. H. (2003) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10075 · Cited by 695
(2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154054.001.0001 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Published
- 1968
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1, Pt.2
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073679637
- Cited by
- 2,827
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 72.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0025327
- The paper
- Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
