The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards.
Abstract
The development of a Ward Atmosphere Scale, which differentiates between the social atmospheres of psychiatric inpatient wards, is described. An initial form of the scale was given to patients and staff on 14 wards from Veterans Administration, state, community, private, and university hospitals. The 2nd form of the scale consists of items which significantly differentiate between wards for patients and/or staff. This form includes 12 subscales, e.g., Spontaneity, Autonomy, Affiliation, Aggression, Variety, and Support, each of which measures the emphasis on 1 dimension of ward atmosphere. Ward profiles which compare average patient perceptions of different wards have been constructed. The importance of developing measures of psychological environments and the implications relating to the matching of individual needs and environmental press were discussed. Most current personality theories subscribe either explicitly or implicitly to the belief that behavior is a joint function of both the person and the environment. Until the present, however, personality theorists have emphasized and studied the person and have paid relatively little attention to the systematic conceptualization and assessment of environmental dimensions. Notable exceptions to this generalization have been Cattell, Lewin, and Murray, all of whom have attempted to include environmental as well as person variables in their theories. For example, Murray's concept of environmental press provides an external situational counterpart to internalized personality needs. If one seriously believes the general proposition that behavior is some interactive function of individual needs and environmental
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social environment of junior high and high school classrooms.
Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1973) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034823 · Cited by 393
Self-citationDickens, G. L., Suesse, M., Snyman, P., & Picchioni, M. (2014) · The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology · doi:10.1080/14789949.2014.903505 · Cited by 32
Eklund, M., & Brunt, D. (2019) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278717727333 · Cited by 8
Safety First! Residential Group Climate and Antisocial Behavior: A Multilevel Meta-analysis
E. M. A, E., J. J, R., G. H. P, V. D. H., E. J. E, H., C. H. Z, K., K. S, N., S, V., J. D, L., G. J. J. M, S., E, K., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology · doi:10.1177/0306624x241252052 · Cited by 4
“The “atmosphere” dimension concerns the degree to which the physical and social environment foster feelings of safety and trust among residents (Moos & Houts, 1968; Van der Helm, Stams, et al., 2011; Robinson et al., 2018).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Moos, R. H., & Houts, P. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Abnormal Psychology
- Published
- 1968-12
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 595-604
- ISSN
- 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1846
- OpenAlex
- W2015916827
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0026600
- The paper
- Moos, R. H., & Houts, P. S. (1968). Assessment of the social atmospheres of psychiatric wards. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.