The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction of information in word recognition.
Abstract
Quantitative predictions are made from a model for word recognition. The model has as its central feature a set of "logogens": devices which accept information relevant to a particular word response irrespective of the source of this information. When more than a threshold amount of information has accumulated in any logogen, that particular response becomes available for responding. The model is tested against data available on the effect of word frequency on recognition, the effect of limiting the number of response alternatives, the interaction of stimulus and context, and the interaction of successive presentations of stimuli. The implications of the underlying model are largely upheld. Other possible models for word recognition are discussed as are the implications of the Logogen Model for theories of memory. In previous papers a functional model for word recognition has been developed (Morton, 1964a, 1964b, 1964d; Morton & Broadbent, 1967). The form of description used only lent itself to qualitative predictions and while it seemed to have some heuristic value, the overall system was too complex to allow rigorous specification of its properties. In the present paper the model is first outlined in a slightly simplified way and then certain features of it are isolated in order to make quantitative predictions about performance in word recognition. The various predictions made are largely independent and have in common only the fact that in all situations there is some stimulus information present. The effects of word frequency are taken to indicate relatively permanent changes in the system; the effects of having a reduced set of alternative responses involve temporary changes in the same variable. Different predictions are made concerning the interaction of a context with the stimulus and the effects of repeated presentation, these differences arising from differences in the potential sources of such information. The model contrasts most completely with explanations of word
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3 · Cited by 7,216
Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory
Melton, A. W. (1963) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(63)80063-8 · Cited by 739
Cited by
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.375 · Cited by 4,889
DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 · Cited by 4,500
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209080 · Cited by 4,375
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.4.523 · Cited by 3,909
Mesulam, M. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1013 · Cited by 3,072
Metadata
- Authors
- Morton, J.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1969-03
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-178
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2040187703
- Cited by
- 2,151
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
