The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance.
Abstract
Subjects worked at a 10-item Anagrams Test containing items of approximately 50% difficulty. Before they began they rated how confident they were that they could pass the test (i.e., solve 5 anagrams or more). After they finished they recorded the number of anagrams they had solved, the degree to which they felt that their performance was due to ability (internal attribution) or luck (external attribution), and their degree of satisfaction with performance. It was found that the unexpected success was more often attributed to good luck than the expected success and was associated with greater satisfaction. The unexpected failure was more often attributed to bad luck than the expected failure and was associated with greater dissatisfaction. Subjects who just passed or just failed the test were more likely to engage in external attribution than subjects with extreme scores in either direction. Performance was positively related to initial confidence. Females were lower in initial confidence, higher in external attribution, and higher in feelings of inadequacy than were males. Results were discussed in terms of Heiderian theory and a valence-diffic ulty model. The present study had two main aims. First it attempted to clarify the conditions that influence the way in which a person assigns responsibility for the outcome when he succeeds or fails at a task. This attribution of responsibilit y may be internal, in which case success or failure is seen as mainly reflecting characteristics of the self (e.g., ability and skill), or the attribution may be external, in which case the outcome is seen as primarily due to outside influences over which the person has little or no control (e.g., luck). The following questions were investigated: When a person succeeds at a task, what factors determine whether he attributes his success to his own ability (internal control) or to good luck (external control)? And when he fails at a task, what factors determine whether he attributes his failure to his own lack of ability (internal control) or to bad luck (external control)? The second aim of the study was to investigate factors that influence the degree to 1The analysis of results reported in this paper was supported by a grant from the Australian Research Grants Committee.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
Cited by
Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193 · Cited by 7,814
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?
Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076486 · Cited by 2,575
Metadata
- Authors
- Feather, N. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1969-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-144
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2120313965
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0028071
- The paper
- Feather, N. T. (1969). Attribution of responsibility and valence of success and failure in relation to initial confidence and task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.