The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Black is beautiful: A reexamination of racial preference and identification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x · Cited by 3,290
Self-Perceptions of Black Americans: Self-Esteem and Personal Efficacy
Hughes, M., & Demo, D. H. (1989) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229216 · Cited by 417
Skin Color and Colorism: Global Research, Concepts, and Measurement
Dixon, A. R., & Telles, E. E. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053315 · Cited by 385
Factors influencing racial comparisons of self-esteem: A quantitative review.
Gray‐Little, B., & Hafdahl, A. R. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.26 · Cited by 375
Metadata
- Authors
- Hraba, J., & Grant, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1970
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 398-402
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2024833539
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black is beautiful: A reexamination of racial preference and identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0030043
- The paper
- Hraba, J., & Grant, G. (1970). Black is beautiful: A reexamination of racial preference and identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
