Cited by 90Stress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Chronic fear and ulcers in rats as a function of the unpredictability of safety.

Seligman, Martin E., Meyer, Bruce·1970·Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0030219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seligman, M. E., & Meyer, B.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology
Published
1970
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
202-207
ISSN
0021-9940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068379345
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
gastric ulcer, ulcerogenesis, unpredictability, safety, anxiety, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Electroshock, Fear, Feeding Behavior, Male, Stomach Ulcer, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review