Cited by 54History, Medicine, and LeadershipPsychoanalysis and Social CritiquePsychological Testing and Assessment

The pathos of power: A psychological perspective

Clark, Kenneth B.·1971·American Psychologist

Abstract

THERE is something about the aura of the term which makes it a special burden and a special source of anxiety for everyone involved. Every speech, address, article, or essay exposes an important part of oneself for critical examination by an audience or by readers. For a long time, I have tried to persuade my students that everything that a person writes—all forms of communication—may be viewed as projective materials which reveal aspects of the totality and the complexity of his personality to sensitive observers. If this is true it would follow that to communicate to psychologists, who view themselves as experts in the analysis of personality and character, is to invite not only an analysis of the substance of what one communicates, but also to expose oneself to probing and critical examination. There must be an incorrigible ego drive which propels one to assume the risks of exposure to an audience of psychologists, given the fact that the threat of exposure is greater the more accurate are the judgments concerning the character and wisdom of the speaker. There remains the problem of how can one make a presidential address in some way worth the anxieties and risks? One could use it as an opportunity to try to clarify the underlying conceptual framework implicit in his thoughts, research, writing, teaching, and social action. In one's personal and professional life, it is possible to move from project to project and from encounter to encounter, and to take on a variety of responsibilities and roles without having the time to give thought to the theo-

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0032217

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, K. B.
Affiliations
City College of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Kenneth B.
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1971-12
Volume
26
Issue
12
Pages
1047-1057
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2069850487
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
50.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › History, Medicine, and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
power, pathos, presidential address, psychological perspective, anxiety, communication, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review