Conformity and character
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals feel indirect pressure to change their own behavior in order to conform to an admired peer group.
“Individuals feel indirect pressure to change their own behavior in order to conform to an admired peer group.”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Crutchfield, 1955
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 4 · Cited by 820
- Authors
- Crutchfield, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crutchfield, Richard S.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1955-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 191-198
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- 1935-990X
- OpenAlex
- W2046269721
- Cited by
- 820
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 236.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- conformity, character, personality, social influence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
