The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Comparative Analysis of Learning: Are the laws of learning the same in all animals?
Bitterman, M. E. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.188.4189.699 · Cited by 492
Partial reinforcement: A hypothesis of sequential effects.
Capaldi, E. J. (1966) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0023684 · Cited by 317
The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning
Hembrooke, H. A., Granka, L. A., Gay, G. K., & Liddy, E. D. (2005) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20180 · Cited by 97
Seligman (1967) · doi:10.1037/h0024516 · Cited by 41
Reward magnitude determines reinforcement learning efficiency
Gong, S., Martell, A., Dudman, J. T., & Coddington, L. T. (2026) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aeb0813 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Published
- 1961-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234-242
- ISSN
- 0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026803145
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0042251
- The paper
- Wagner, A. R. (1961). Effects of amount and percentage of reinforcement and number of acquisition trials on conditioning and extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
