Cited by 492Memory and Neural MechanismsEducational methodologies and cognitive developmentGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

The Comparative Analysis of Learning: Are the laws of learning the same in all animals?

Bitterman, M. E.·1975·Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.188.4189.699

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no single method that can be applied without bias across taxa.

    “Undoubtedly, there is no single method that can be applied without bias across taxa (Bitterman 1975; Savage and Snowdon 1989).”

    From How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology (2012) · cites this paper as Bitterman 1975

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bitterman, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Bitterman, M. E.
Venue
Science
Published
1975-05-16
Volume
188
Issue
4189
Pages
699-709
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2077636910
Cited by
492
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational methodologies and cognitive development
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
comparative analysis, learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review