Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201Social and Intergroup PsychologyCategorization, perception, and languagePsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social categorization as a function of latitude of acceptance and series range.

Sherif, Carolyn W.·1963·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0043022

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Metadata

Authors
Sherif, C. W.
Corresponding author
Sherif, Carolyn W.
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Published
1963-08
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
148-156
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093373777
Cited by
199
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
social categorization, person perception
MeSH terms
Ethnopsychology, Humans, Psychology, Social

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.